arXiv:2504.18578cs.LG2025-04被引 15

用AI预测急诊室拥堵,提前6小时或24小时预警,帮医院合理排班。

An Artificial Intelligence-Based Framework for Predicting Emergency Department Overcrowding: Development and Evaluation Study

  • 用11种机器学习模型结合内部数据与外部特征,预测急诊室等待人数。
  • 6小时预测误差仅4.19人,24小时平均误差2.00人,关键时段精准度高。
  • 适合医院管理者、急诊科医生用于提前调配人力,缓解拥堵。

急诊室拥堵仍是重大挑战,导致就诊延迟和运营压力。本文开发了两种机器学习模型,分别预测未来6小时(如下午1点预测晚上7点)和未来24小时平均等待人数(如下午5点预测次日均值)。基于美国东南部某医院的数据,融合内部指标与外部特征,评估了11种算法。结果表明,TSiTPlus在小时级预测中表现最佳(MAE: 4.19,MSE: 29.32),平均等待人数为18.11,标准差9.77;极端情况(+1、+2、+3σ)下误差分别为6.16、10.16、15.59。日级预测中XCMPlus最优(MAE: 2.00,MSE: 6.64),日均等待数18.11,标准差4.51。模型可有效支持资源预分配,改善患者流动,减轻急诊负担。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Background: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding remains a major challenge, causing delays in care and increased operational strain. Hospital management often reacts to congestion after it occurs. Machine learning predictive modeling offers a proactive approach by forecasting patient flow metrics, such as waiting count, to improve resource planning and hospital efficiency. Objective: This study develops machine learning models to predict ED waiting room occupancy at two time scales. The hourly model forecasts the waiting count six hours ahead (e.g., a 1 PM prediction for 7 PM), while the daily model estimates the average waiting count for the next 24 hours (e.g., a 5 PM prediction for the following day's average). These tools support staffing decisions and enable earlier interventions to reduce overcrowding. Methods: Data from a partner hospital's ED in the southeastern United States were used, integrating internal metrics and external features. Eleven machine learning algorithms, including traditional and deep learning models, were trained and evaluated. Feature combinations were optimized, and performance was assessed across varying patient volumes and hours. Results: TSiTPlus achieved the best hourly prediction (MAE: 4.19, MSE: 29.32). The mean hourly waiting count was 18.11, with a standard deviation of 9.77. Accuracy varied by hour, with MAEs ranging from 2.45 (11 PM) to 5.45 (8 PM). Extreme case analysis at one, two, and three standard deviations above the mean showed MAEs of 6.16, 10.16, and 15.59, respectively. For daily predictions, XCMPlus performed best (MAE: 2.00, MSE: 6.64), with a daily mean of 18.11 and standard deviation of 4.51. Conclusions: These models accurately forecast ED waiting room occupancy and support proactive resource allocation. Their implementation has the potential to improve patient flow and reduce overcrowding in emergency care settings.

急诊预测机器学习资源调度

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。