arXiv:2504.19203eess.IVcs.CV2025-04

用实例归一化+增强+对比损失,提升MRI预测膝关节置换的泛化能力

Improving Generalization in MRI-Based Deep Learning Models for Total Knee Replacement Prediction

  • 用实例归一化替代批量归一化,适应不同源影像数据
  • 结合GIN增强与对比损失,使同类样本特征更接近
  • 在跨域数据上表现更稳定,适合临床实际应用

膝骨关节炎(KOA)是常见关节疾病,常导致疼痛和行动障碍。尽管基于MRI的深度学习模型在预测全膝关节置换(TKR)和疾病进展方面表现优异,但其泛化能力仍面临挑战,尤其是在不同来源影像数据上的应用。本研究通过将批量归一化替换为实例归一化、采用数据增强技术,并引入对比损失,显著提升了模型泛化性能。训练与评估使用来自骨关节炎倡议(OAI)数据库的MRI数据,以矢状位脂肪抑制中间加权快速自旋回波(FS-IW-TSE)图像作为源域,矢状位脂肪抑制三维稳态双回波(3D DESS)图像作为目标域。结果表明,使用实例归一化的基线模型配合全局强度非线性(GIN)增强方法及监督对比损失后,分类指标在两个域间均有统计学显著提升。在3D实例归一化下,采用GIN增强结合对比损失的方法优于所有单源域泛化方法;对比有无对比损失的结果显示,加入对比损失始终带来性能提升。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common joint disease that causes pain and mobility issues. While MRI-based deep learning models have demonstrated superior performance in predicting total knee replacement (TKR) and disease progression, their generalizability remains challenging, particularly when applied to imaging data from different sources. In this study, we show that replacing batch normalization with instance normalization, using data augmentation, and applying contrastive loss improves generalization. For training and evaluation, we used MRI data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database, considering sagittal fat-suppressed intermediate-weighted turbo spin-echo (FS-IW-TSE) images as the source domain and sagittal fat-suppressed three-dimensional (3D) dual-echo in steady state (DESS) images as the target domain. The results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in classification metrics across both domains by replacing batch normalization with instance normalization in the baseline model, generating augmented input views using the Global Intensity Non-linear (GIN) augmentation method, and incorporating a supervised contrastive loss alongside the classification loss to align representations of samples with the same label. The GIN method with contrastive loss performed better than all evaluated single-source domain generalization methods when using 3D instance normalization. Comparing GIN with and without contrastive loss (for both normalization types) showed that adding contrastive loss consistently led to better performance.

医学影像深度学习泛化能力MRI分析

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。