比较四大地区AI治理差异，揭示人权保护与创新平衡的多元路径。
Navigating AI Policy Landscapes: Insights into Human Rights Considerations Across IEEE Regions
- 对比美、欧、中、新四地AI政策，分析其人权考量机制。
- 欧洲强监管保护个体权利，美国重创新轻约束，中国强调国家控制，新加坡倡自律对接国际。
- 适合关注AI伦理治理与跨国政策协调的研究者与政策制定者。
本文探讨了人工智能在不同IEEE区域（美国地区1-6、欧洲地区8、中国及新加坡所属的地区10）的监管框架中如何融入人权考量。尽管各方均认可AI的变革潜力和伦理规范的必要性，但其监管方式存在显著差异：欧洲采用严格保护个人权利的制度，美国侧重促进创新而监管较宽松，中国则强调国家控制与社会秩序，新加坡则以咨询性框架推动自我监管，并与国际标准保持一致。该对比分析凸显了在全球范围内持续对话的必要性，以协调既能保障人权又可促进技术进步的AI治理体系，反映了各区域不同的视角与优先事项。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This paper explores the integration of human rights considerations into AI regulatory frameworks across different IEEE regions - specifically the United States (Region 1-6), Europe (Region 8), China (part of Region 10), and Singapore (part of Region 10). While all acknowledge the transformative potential of AI and the necessity of ethical guidelines, their regulatory approaches significantly differ. Europe exhibits a rigorous framework with stringent protections for individual rights, while the U.S. promotes innovation with less restrictive regulations. China emphasizes state control and societal order in its AI strategies. In contrast, Singapore's advisory framework encourages self-regulation and aligns closely with international norms. This comparative analysis underlines the need for ongoing global dialogue to harmonize AI regulations that safeguard human rights while promoting technological advancement, reflecting the diverse perspectives and priorities of each region.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。