用机制可解释性解析神经网络在生物统计因果推断中的内部运作
On the Mechanistic Interpretability of Neural Networks for Causality in Bio-statistics
- 通过机制可解释技术分析神经网络学习的内部表征
- 揭示网络处理协变量与治疗因素的不同计算路径
- 比较不同模型在因果分析中的机制差异,提升可信度
可解释性洞察对生物统计学至关重要,尤其是在评估因果关系时。尽管神经网络(NNs)能有效建模复杂生物数据,但其传统“黑箱”特性在高风险医疗应用中难以验证和信任。近期的机制可解释性(MI)进展旨在破解网络内部计算过程。本研究探讨了MI技术在生物统计因果推断中神经网络的应用。结果表明,MI工具可用于:(1)探测并验证神经网络学习到的内部表示,如目标最小损失估计(TMLE)框架中对无关函数的估计;(2)发现并可视化网络处理不同类型输入时采用的独立计算路径,可能揭示协变量与治疗因素的处理方式;(3)提供跨统计模型、机器学习模型和神经网络的机制比较方法,深化对各类模型在因果生物统计分析中优劣的理解。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Interpretable insights from predictive models remain critical in bio-statistics, particularly when assessing causality, where classical statistical and machine learning methods often provide inherent clarity. While Neural Networks (NNs) offer powerful capabilities for modeling complex biological data, their traditional "black-box" nature presents challenges for validation and trust in high-stakes health applications. Recent advances in Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) aim to decipher the internal computations learned by these networks. This work investigates the application of MI techniques to NNs within the context of causal inference for bio-statistics. We demonstrate that MI tools can be leveraged to: (1) probe and validate the internal representations learned by NNs, such as those estimating nuisance functions in frameworks like Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation (TMLE); (2) discover and visualize the distinct computational pathways employed by the network to process different types of inputs, potentially revealing how confounders and treatments are handled; and (3) provide methodologies for comparing the learned mechanisms and extracted insights across statistical, machine learning, and NN models, fostering a deeper understanding of their respective strengths and weaknesses for causal bio-statistical analysis.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。