构建首个带推理链的视频理解数据集,让大模型真正“说清楚”怎么想的。
MINERVA: Evaluating Complex Video Reasoning
- 设计包含5个选项和人工标注推理链的新数据集
- 发现模型错误主要源于时间定位与视觉感知问题
- 适合评估视频推理能力的前沿多模态模型
多模态大模型正转向视频基准测试,但多数基准仅提供结果监督,缺乏中间可解释的推理步骤。这使得难以判断模型是否真正结合感知与时间信息进行推理,还是仅靠偶然或语言偏见得分。为此,我们提出名为MINERVA的新视频推理数据集,每个问题包含5个答案选项及详细人工编写的推理链条。该数据集多模态、涵盖多样视频领域与长度,包含复杂多步问题。广泛基准测试表明,该数据集对前沿开源与专有模型构成挑战。通过细粒度错误分析,我们识别出常见失败模式并建立推理错误分类体系。进一步探索人类与大模型作为评判者的方法,发现错误主要关联时间定位,其次为视觉感知,而非逻辑或完整性问题。数据集及题目、答案候选与推理链将公开于https://github.com/google-deepmind/neptune?tab=readme-ov-file#minerva。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Multimodal LLMs are turning their focus to video benchmarks, however most video benchmarks only provide outcome supervision, with no intermediate or interpretable reasoning steps. This makes it challenging to assess if models are truly able to combine perceptual and temporal information to reason about videos, or simply get the correct answer by chance or by exploiting linguistic biases. To remedy this, we provide a new video reasoning dataset called MINERVA for modern multimodal models. Each question in the dataset comes with 5 answer choices, as well as detailed, hand-crafted reasoning traces. Our dataset is multimodal, diverse in terms of video domain and length, and consists of complex multi-step questions. Extensive benchmarking shows that our dataset provides a challenge for frontier open-source and proprietary models. We perform fine-grained error analysis to identify common failure modes across various models, and create a taxonomy of reasoning errors. We use this to explore both human and LLM-as-a-judge methods for scoring video reasoning traces, and find that failure modes are primarily related to temporal localization, followed by visual perception errors, as opposed to logical or completeness errors. The dataset, along with questions, answer candidates and reasoning traces will be publicly available under https://github.com/google-deepmind/neptune?tab=readme-ov-file\#minerva.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。