融合物理规律与机器学习,提升金属3D打印微观结构预测精度。
Computational, Data-Driven, and Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approaches for Microstructure Modeling in Metal Additive Manufacturing
- 将物理定律嵌入神经网络,构建可解释的混合模型。
- 相比纯数据驱动方法,显著提升小样本下的预测准确性。
- 适合需要高可靠性和物理一致性的工业级制造场景。
金属增材制造虽赋予设计自由并生产复杂构件,但其快速熔凝过程导致非平衡、不均匀的微观结构,严重影响力学性能与功能表现。精确预测微观结构及其跨时空演化仍是工艺优化与缺陷控制的核心挑战。传统实验与物理仿真虽具理论基础,但成本高、效率低;数据驱动机器学习虽能高效识别模式,却常为黑箱,缺乏泛化能力与物理一致性。为此,物理信息机器学习(PIML)通过在神经网络中嵌入物理方程,成为新兴范式,增强模型准确性、透明性、数据效率与外推能力。本文系统评估了金属增材制造中微观结构建模的策略,深入分析实验、计算与数据驱动方法的优劣,重点探讨融合物理知识与机器学习的混合框架进展。针对数据稀缺、多尺度耦合与不确定性量化等关键挑战提出未来方向。结果表明,基于PIML的混合方法对实现可预测、可扩展且物理一致的微观结构建模至关重要,有助于实现特定场景下的微结构感知工艺调控,保障高性能增材制造部件的可靠生产。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Metal additive manufacturing enables unprecedented design freedom and the production of customized, complex components. However, the rapid melting and solidification dynamics inherent to metal AM processes generate heterogeneous, non-equilibrium microstructures that significantly impact mechanical properties and subsequent functionality. Predicting microstructure and its evolution across spatial and temporal scales remains a central challenge for process optimization and defect mitigation. While conventional experimental techniques and physics-based simulations provide a physical foundation and valuable insights, they face critical limitations. In contrast, data-driven machine learning offers an alternative prediction approach and powerful pattern recognition but often operate as black-box, lacking generalizability and physical consistency. To overcome these limitations, physics-informed machine learning, including physics-informed neural networks, has emerged as a promising paradigm by embedding governing physical laws into neural network architectures, thereby enhancing accuracy, transparency, data efficiency, and extrapolation capabilities. This work presents a comprehensive evaluation of modeling strategies for microstructure prediction in metal AM. The strengths and limitations of experimental, computational, and data-driven methods are analyzed in depth, and highlight recent advances in hybrid PIML frameworks that integrate physical knowledge with ML. Key challenges, such as data scarcity, multi-scale coupling, and uncertainty quantification, are discussed alongside future directions. Ultimately, this assessment underscores the importance of PIML-based hybrid approaches in enabling predictive, scalable, and physically consistent microstructure modeling for site-specific, microstructure-aware process control and the reliable production of high-performance AM components.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。