arXiv:2505.01651cs.AIcs.CY2025-05被引 10

提出人机共治框架,以信任与效能为导向重构治理逻辑。

Human-AI Governance (HAIG): A Trust-Utility Approach

  • 从权力、自主性、问责三维度构建连续谱系,取代僵化分类。
  • 识别关键阈值点,实现治理随关系演变动态调整。
  • 适用于医疗、欧盟监管等场景,助力前瞻性制度设计。

本文提出人类-人工智能治理(HAIG)框架,突破传统将AI视为被治理对象的局限,强调人与AI之间的关系动态。现有分类框架(如人在回路模型)难以捕捉基础模型涌现能力及多智能体系统自主目标设定带来的演进。随着系统部署于不同情境,主体性在复杂模式中重新分配,更宜用连续谱表示而非离散类别。HAIG框架包含三个层级:维度(决策权、过程自主性、问责配置)、连续谱(各维度上的位置光谱)和阈值(治理需求质变的关键点)。其架构具备层级无关性,可应用于个体决策、组织治理至国家与国际监管设计。不同于将治理视为对AI部署的约束,HAIG采用信任-效用导向,将治理视为人机协作潜力实现的前提,依据具体关系情境校准监督强度,而非依赖预设类别。医疗与欧洲监管案例表明,该框架可补充现有体系,并为前瞻性监管设计提供基础。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This paper introduces the Human-AI Governance (HAIG) framework, contributing to the AI Governance (AIG) field by foregrounding the relational dynamics between human and AI actors rather than treating AI systems as objects of governance alone. Current categorical frameworks (e.g., human-in-the-loop models) inadequately capture how AI systems evolve from tools to partners, particularly as foundation models demonstrate emergent capabilities and multi-agent systems exhibit autonomous goal-setting behaviours. As systems are deployed across contexts, agency redistributes in complex patterns that are better represented as positions along continua rather than discrete categories. The HAIG framework operates across three levels: dimensions (Decision Authority, Process Autonomy, and Accountability Configuration), continua (continuous positional spectra along each dimension), and thresholds (critical points along the continua where governance requirements shift qualitatively). The framework's dimensional architecture is level-agnostic, applicable from individual deployment decisions and organisational governance through to sectorial comparison and national and international regulatory design. Unlike risk-based or principle-based approaches that treat governance primarily as a constraint on AI deployment, HAIG adopts a trust-utility orientation - reframing governance as the condition under which human-AI collaboration can realise its potential, calibrating oversight to specific relational contexts rather than predetermined categories. Case studies in healthcare and European regulation demonstrate how HAIG complements existing frameworks while offering a foundation for adaptive regulatory design that anticipates governance challenges before they emerge.

人机协同治理框架信任机制连续谱

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。