arXiv:2505.01956cs.ROcs.AI2025-05

在无GPS战场环境中,用地标定位+动态模型实现安全高效导航。

SafeNav: Safe Path Navigation using Landmark Based Localization in a GPS-denied Environment

  • 结合地标定位与战场运动模型,用卡尔曼滤波提升定位精度。
  • 真实模拟数据下,定位误差比现有方法降低23%以上,风险评分更优。
  • 提出两种安全路径规划算法,兼顾避障、风险控制与计算效率。

在战场环境中,敌方常干扰GPS信号,需替代性定位与导航方法。传统视觉方法如同时定位与地图构建(SLAM)和视觉里程计(VO)依赖复杂传感器融合且计算量大;而无需测距的方法如DV-HOP在稀疏、动态网络中存在精度与稳定性问题。本文提出LanBLoc-BMM,结合基于地标的定位(LanBLoc)、战场专用运动模型(BMM)与扩展卡尔曼滤波(EKF)。在合成与真实模拟轨迹数据集上,以平均位移误差(ADE)、最终位移误差(FDE)及新提出的平均加权风险得分(AWRS)为指标,对比三种先进视觉定位算法。结果表明,集成EKF的LanBLoc-BMM在真实模拟数据上表现最优。进一步提出两种安全导航方法:SafeNav-CHull与SafeNav-Centroid,将LanBLoc-BMM(EKF)与新型风险感知RRT*(RAw-RRT*)结合,实现障碍规避与风险暴露最小化。仿真结果显示,SafeNav-Centroid在精度、风险控制与路径效率方面表现最佳,SafeNav-CHull则具备更高计算速度。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

In battlefield environments, adversaries frequently disrupt GPS signals, requiring alternative localization and navigation methods. Traditional vision-based approaches like Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) and Visual Odometry (VO) involve complex sensor fusion and high computational demand, whereas range-free methods like DV-HOP face accuracy and stability challenges in sparse, dynamic networks. This paper proposes LanBLoc-BMM, a navigation approach using landmark-based localization (LanBLoc) combined with a battlefield-specific motion model (BMM) and Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). Its performance is benchmarked against three state-of-the-art visual localization algorithms integrated with BMM and Bayesian filters, evaluated on synthetic and real-imitated trajectory datasets using metrics including Average Displacement Error (ADE), Final Displacement Error (FDE), and a newly introduced Average Weighted Risk Score (AWRS). LanBLoc-BMM (with EKF) demonstrates superior performance in ADE, FDE, and AWRS on real-imitated datasets. Additionally, two safe navigation methods, SafeNav-CHull and SafeNav-Centroid, are introduced by integrating LanBLoc-BMM(EKF) with a novel Risk-Aware RRT* (RAw-RRT*) algorithm for obstacle avoidance and risk exposure minimization. Simulation results in battlefield scenarios indicate SafeNav-Centroid excels in accuracy, risk exposure, and trajectory efficiency, while SafeNav-CHull provides superior computational speed.

自主导航定位算法安全路径战场应用

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。