arXiv:2505.02361cond-mat.mtrl-scics.LG2025-05被引 4

用化学组成判断材料是否为金属,靠简单规则+周期表先验知识

Learning simple heuristic rules for classifying materials based on chemical composition

  • 基于周期表结构引入化学先验,设计可解释的分类规则
  • 小样本下准确率显著优于传统深度学习模型
  • 适合需要可解释性与低数据成本的材料筛选场景

过去十年,机器学习在材料科学中备受关注。尽管复杂非线性模型预测精度高,但本研究提出一种基于'拓度性'概念的简单可学习启发式规则,仅凭化学组成即可判断材料是否具有拓扑性质。本文进一步将该方法拓展至金属性分类任务,并提出融合周期表结构信息的化学先验框架。通过在多种训练集规模下对比有无化学先验的性能,发现引入化学先验能显著降低达到目标测试准确率所需的训练数据量。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

In the past decade, there has been a significant interest in the use of machine learning approaches in materials science research. Conventional deep learning approaches that rely on complex, nonlinear models have become increasingly important in computational materials science due to their high predictive accuracy. In contrast to these approaches, we have shown in a recent work that a remarkably simple learned heuristic rule -- based on the concept of topogivity -- can classify whether a material is topological using only its chemical composition. In this paper, we go beyond the topology classification scenario by also studying the use of machine learning to develop simple heuristic rules for classifying whether a material is a metal based on chemical composition. Moreover, we present a framework for incorporating chemistry-informed inductive bias based on the structure of the periodic table. For both the topology classification and the metallicity classification tasks, we empirically characterize the performance of simple heuristic rules fit with and without chemistry-informed inductive bias across a wide range of training set sizes. We find evidence that incorporating chemistry-informed inductive bias can reduce the amount of training data required to reach a given level of test accuracy.

材料科学可解释性小样本学习周期表先验

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。