arXiv:2505.07317cs.CYcs.AI2025-05中稿 · publication at the…被引 6

企业推动绿色AI乏力,监管缺位导致环保意识薄弱

How Do Companies Manage the Environmental Sustainability of AI? An Interview Study About Green AI Efforts and Regulations

  • 11家受访公司中9家优先追求业务效率,忽视环境影响
  • 仅1人监测AI碳排放,多数未采取减排措施
  • 欧盟新规效果有限,需更易用的绿色工具提升实践

随着人工智能应用日益广泛,其对环境的负面影响已不容忽视。本文通过11名来自10家采用AI软件企业的从业者访谈,探究工业界对绿色AI的认知与管理现状。研究聚焦三大主题:AI采纳、减缓环境影响的举措,以及欧盟《人工智能法案》和《企业可持续性报告指令》(CSRD)的影响。结果显示,11名受访者中有9人将业务效率置于首位,极少考虑环境可持续性;仅1人主动监测负面环境影响;6人未采取任何缓解措施,其余多依赖提示工程、使用小型模型或减少使用等零散做法。对欧盟《人工智能法案》的认知和遵守程度低,仅1人提及该法规影响;而CSRD主要促使大型企业开展可持续性报告。整体表明企业对可持续AI缺乏紧迫感,现行监管效力不足,建议政策制定者加强引导,并提供更易用的绿色技术工具以提升行业实践水平。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

With the ever-growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), AI-based software and its negative impact on the environment are no longer negligible, and studying and mitigating this impact has become a critical area of research. However, it is currently unclear which role environmental sustainability plays during AI adoption in industry and how AI regulations influence Green AI practices and decision-making in industry. We therefore aim to investigate the Green AI perception and management of industry practitioners. To this end, we conducted a total of 11 interviews with participants from 10 different organizations that adopted AI-based software. The interviews explored three main themes: AI adoption, current efforts in mitigating the negative environmental impact of AI, and the influence of the EU AI Act and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Our findings indicate that 9 of 11 participants prioritized business efficiency during AI adoption, with minimal consideration of environmental sustainability. Monitoring and mitigation of AI's environmental impact were very limited. Only one participant monitored negative environmental effects. Regarding applied mitigation practices, six participants reported no actions, with the others sporadically mentioning techniques like prompt engineering, relying on smaller models, or not overusing AI. Awareness and compliance with the EU AI Act are low, with only one participant reporting on its influence, while the CSRD drove sustainability reporting efforts primarily in larger companies. All in all, our findings reflect a lack of urgency and priority for sustainable AI among these companies. We suggest that current regulations are not very effective, which has implications for policymakers. Additionally, there is a need to raise industry awareness, but also to provide user-friendly techniques and tools for Green AI practices.

绿色AI企业调研政策影响可持续性

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。