arXiv:2505.09011cs.LG2025-05被引 5

AI自动分析骨转移癌MRI,精准量化治疗反应。

AI-driven software for automated quantification of skeletal metastases and treatment response evaluation using Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI (WB-DWI) in Advanced Prostate Cancer

  • 用弱监督模型分离骨骼,再结合信号归一化识别可疑病灶。
  • 自动提取的体积和扩散系数与人工标注差异小,重复性高。
  • 适合肿瘤影像医生和临床研究者快速评估治疗效果。

晚期前列腺癌骨转移的定量疗效评估仍是临床未满足需求。全身影像扩散加权MRI(WB-DWI)提供两种生物标志物:总扩散体积(TDV)和全局表观扩散系数(gADC)。但手动勾画病灶追踪变化繁琐且易受读片者差异影响。本文开发了一款自动化软件:首先通过弱监督残差U-Net生成骨骼概率图;其次构建统计框架对WB-DWI信号进行归一化,获得标准化b=900s/mm²图像(b900);最后使用浅层卷积网络融合前两者输出,生成疑似骨转移病灶掩码(基于b900信号升高反映水分子受限扩散)。该掩码作用于gADC图以提取TDV与gADC统计量。在66个数据集上验证,与专家勾画结果平均Dice分数为0.6(盆腔及脊柱病灶),平均表面距离2mm。log-TDV与中位gADC相对差异分别为8.8%和5%。重复性分析显示,log-TDV与中位gADC的变异系数分别为4.6%和3.5%,组内相关系数均高于0.94。与参考标准对比,软件在疗效评估中达到80.5%准确率、84.3%敏感度、85.7%特异度。单次扫描平均计算时间90秒。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Quantitative assessment of treatment response in Advanced Prostate Cancer (APC) with bone metastases remains an unmet clinical need. Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI (WB-DWI) provides two response biomarkers: Total Diffusion Volume (TDV) and global Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (gADC). However, tracking post-treatment changes of TDV and gADC from manually delineated lesions is cumbersome and increases inter-reader variability. We developed a software to automate this process. Core technologies include: (i) a weakly-supervised Residual U-Net model generating a skeleton probability map to isolate bone; (ii) a statistical framework for WB-DWI intensity normalisation, obtaining a signal-normalised b=900s/mm^2 (b900) image; and (iii) a shallow convolutional neural network that processes outputs from (i) and (ii) to generate a mask of suspected bone lesions, characterised by higher b900 signal intensity due to restricted water diffusion. This mask is applied to the gADC map to extract TDV and gADC statistics. We tested the tool using expert-defined metastatic bone disease delineations on 66 datasets, assessed repeatability of imaging biomarkers (N=10), and compared software-based response assessment with a construct reference standard (N=118). Average dice score between manual and automated delineations was 0.6 for lesions within pelvis and spine, with an average surface distance of 2mm. Relative differences for log-transformed TDV (log-TDV) and median gADC were 8.8% and 5%, respectively. Repeatability analysis showed coefficients of variation of 4.6% for log-TDV and 3.5% for median gADC, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.94 or higher. The software achieved 80.5% accuracy, 84.3% sensitivity, and 85.7% specificity in assessing response to treatment. Average computation time was 90s per scan.

AI影像骨转移MRI治疗评估

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。