医生试用AI诊断解释,找出最能建立信任的类型。
A User Study Evaluating Argumentative Explanations in Diagnostic Decision Support
- 让医生评估不同AI解释方式,明确其论证逻辑
- 发现具体解释类型显著提升诊断信心与理解度
- 为医疗AI设计可信解释提供实证依据,适合临床研究者
随着人工智能在医疗领域的广泛应用,理解何种解释能提升透明度、增强用户对机器学习系统预测结果的信任变得尤为重要。在医生与AI协同决策的场景中,建立互信至关重要。本文探讨了可解释人工智能(XAI)中生成解释的不同方法,并将其背后的论证过程显式化,以便医疗专家评估。特别地,我们开展了一项面向医生的用户研究,调查其在诊断决策支持情境下对不同类型AI生成解释的感知。研究通过问卷评估不同解释形式,并在事后进行访谈,获取关于解释需求的定性洞察。整体来看,研究结果有助于识别最有效的解释类型,为提升医疗AI的可信赖性提供实证支持。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
As the field of healthcare increasingly adopts artificial intelligence, it becomes important to understand which types of explanations increase transparency and empower users to develop confidence and trust in the predictions made by machine learning (ML) systems. In shared decision-making scenarios where doctors cooperate with ML systems to reach an appropriate decision, establishing mutual trust is crucial. In this paper, we explore different approaches to generating explanations in eXplainable AI (XAI) and make their underlying arguments explicit so that they can be evaluated by medical experts. In particular, we present the findings of a user study conducted with physicians to investigate their perceptions of various types of AI-generated explanations in the context of diagnostic decision support. The study aims to identify the most effective and useful explanations that enhance the diagnostic process. In the study, medical doctors filled out a survey to assess different types of explanations. Further, an interview was carried out post-survey to gain qualitative insights on the requirements of explanations incorporated in diagnostic decision support. Overall, the insights gained from this study contribute to understanding the types of explanations that are most effective.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。