用图染色法自动生成可信赖的图模型解释评测数据集
A method for the systematic generation of graph XAI benchmarks via Weisfeiler-Leman coloring
- 基于韦斯费勒-莱曼染色算法自动挖掘区分类别的子图模式
- 构建15个真实分子数据集上的可复现评测集,支持2000+衍生数据
- 为图解释器评估提供大规模、标准化基准,助力安全关键场景
图神经网络已成为结构化数据学习的主流模型,但其决策过程对用户不透明,制约了在安全关键场景中的应用。现有图XAI解释方法聚焦图分类任务,通过识别子图模式来解释预测结果。因此亟需可靠的评测基准以确保解释质量与GNN决策过程一致。然而当前基准多限于简单合成数据或少数人工标注的真实任务,难以实现严谨且可复现的评估,阻碍领域进展。本文提出一种自动化构建图XAI基准的方法:利用韦斯费勒-莱曼(Weisfeiler-Leman)颜色精炼算法高效近似子图匹配,挖掘具有类别判别力的子图模式作为代理真值解释。同时确保这些模式可被GNN学习,因其判别能力与WL表达力一致。本研究还推出OpenGraphXAI基准套件,包含15个基于真实分子分类数据集生成的现成图XAI数据集,并公开代码库,可生成超过2000个额外基准。最后通过案例展示如何利用该套件评估多种主流图解释器,证明大规模基准集合对提升实验结论显著性至关重要。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Graph neural networks have become the de facto model for learning from structured data. However, the decision-making process of GNNs remains opaque to the end user, which undermines their use in safety-critical applications. Several explainable AI techniques for graphs have been developed to address this major issue. Focusing on graph classification, these explainers identify subgraph motifs that explain predictions. Therefore, a robust benchmarking of graph explainers is required to ensure that the produced explanations are of high quality, i.e., aligned with the GNN's decision process. However, current graph-XAI benchmarks are limited to simplistic synthetic datasets or a few real-world tasks curated by domain experts, hindering rigorous and reproducible evaluation, and consequently stalling progress in the field. To overcome these limitations, we propose a method to automate the construction of graph XAI benchmarks from generic graph classification datasets. Our approach leverages the Weisfeiler-Leman color refinement algorithm to efficiently perform approximate subgraph matching and mine class-discriminating motifs, which serve as proxy ground-truth class explanations. At the same time, we ensure that these motifs can be learned by GNNs because their discriminating power aligns with WL expressiveness. This work also introduces the OpenGraphXAI benchmark suite, which consists of 15 ready-made graph-XAI datasets derived by applying our method to real-world molecular classification datasets. The suite is available to the public along with a codebase to generate over 2,000 additional graph-XAI benchmarks. Finally, we present a use case that illustrates how the suite can be used to assess the effectiveness of a selection of popular graph explainers, demonstrating the critical role of a sufficiently large benchmark collection for improving the significance of experimental results.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。