arXiv:2505.20918cs.LGcs.AI2025-05被引 1

用谦逊AI改善招聘算法偏见,提升透明度与可信度。

Humble AI in the real-world: the case of algorithmic hiring

  • 通过不确定性量化和熵估计实现排名透明化
  • 非传统背景候选人被低估问题得到初步缓解
  • 适合关注AI伦理与招聘公平性的从业者

Humble AI(Knowles等,2023)主张在人工智能开发与部署中保持审慎,体现怀疑精神(正视统计学习局限)、好奇心(关注意外结果)和承诺(兼顾性能之外的多元价值)。本文以算法招聘为真实场景,评估某主流招聘平台中的虚拟筛选算法。该领域存在难以通过标准公平性与信任框架检测的误识别与刻板印象问题,例如非传统背景者更难获得高排名。我们展示了如何将谦逊AI原则转化为实践:通过排名不确定性量化、熵估计及突出算法未知性的用户体验设计。初步开展了由招聘人员组成的焦点小组讨论,未来用户研究将检验谦逊AI系统带来的更高认知负荷是否有助于建立对结果的信任。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Humble AI (Knowles et al., 2023) argues for cautiousness in AI development and deployments through scepticism (accounting for limitations of statistical learning), curiosity (accounting for unexpected outcomes), and commitment (accounting for multifaceted values beyond performance). We present a real-world case study for humble AI in the domain of algorithmic hiring. Specifically, we evaluate virtual screening algorithms in a widely used hiring platform that matches candidates to job openings. There are several challenges in misrecognition and stereotyping in such contexts that are difficult to assess through standard fairness and trust frameworks; e.g., someone with a non-traditional background is less likely to rank highly. We demonstrate technical feasibility of how humble AI principles can be translated to practice through uncertainty quantification of ranks, entropy estimates, and a user experience that highlights algorithmic unknowns. We describe preliminary discussions with focus groups made up of recruiters. Future user studies seek to evaluate whether the higher cognitive load of a humble AI system fosters a climate of trust in its outcomes.

AI伦理招聘算法可信AI

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。