arXiv:2505.23846cs.CLcs.MA2025-05被引 1

用并行仿真让AI与非AI代理协同工作,提升复杂问题求解准确率。

Scalable, Symbiotic, AI and Non-AI Agent Based Parallel Discrete Event Simulations

  • 通过因果规则机制让AI与非AI代理按时间顺序协作响应
  • 在多领域任务中整体准确率达68%,远超仅用AI的23%以下
  • 适合需要高可信度和可扩展性的智能系统集成场景

为可信地利用人工智能系统潜力,需无缝耦合多个AI与非AI系统以约束输出并确保正确性。本文提出一种基于并行离散事件仿真(PDES)的新方法,以因果、规则化方式整合多种AI与非AI代理。每个代理作为PDES中的实体,根据其他代理的先前请求作出响应,实现协同工作。该机制使代理在仿真中并行执行任务,同时由非AI代理动态施加约束以控制AI输出,支持在大规模计算集群中部署数百个代理,突破本地内存瓶颈。通过将问题分解为结构化步骤,并提供多选项供AI选择,逐步推进至最终目标,每一步均由非AI代理作为无偏审计员验证动作是否符合规则。我们在四个不同领域的四个问题上评估该方法,结果表明其在AI模型难以独立解决的问题上显著提升准确性:整体准确率达68%,而纯AI模型准确率低于23%。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

To fully leverage the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in a trustworthy manner, it is desirable to couple multiple AI and non-AI systems together seamlessly for constraining and ensuring correctness of the output. This paper introduces a novel parallel discrete event simulation (PDES) based methodology to combine multiple AI and non-AI agents in a causal, rule-based way. Our approach tightly integrates the concept of passage of time, with each agent considered as an entity in the PDES framework and responding to prior requests from other agents. Such coupling mechanism enables the agents to work in a co-operative environment towards a common goal while many tasks run in parallel throughout the simulation. It further enables setting up boundaries to the outputs of the AI agents by applying necessary dynamic constraints using non-AI agents while allowing for scalability through deployment of hundreds of such agents in a larger compute cluster. Distributing smaller AI agents can enable extremely scalable simulations in the future, addressing local memory bottlenecks for model parameter storage. Within a PDES involving both AI and non-AI agents, we break down the problem at hand into structured steps, when necessary, providing a set of multiple choices to the AI agents, and then progressively solve these steps towards a final goal. At each step, the non-AI agents act as unbiased auditors, verifying each action by the AI agents so that certain rules of engagement are followed. We evaluate our approach by solving four problems from four different domains and comparing the results with those from AI models alone. Our results show greater accuracy in solving problems from various domains where the AI models struggle to solve the problems solely by themselves. Results show that overall accuracy of our approach is 68% where as the accuracy of vanilla models is less than 23%.

并行仿真AI协同可信AI多代理系统

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。