用大模型当临床裁判，自动评估医学图像分割是否可用。

Evaluating AI-generated medical image segmentations for clinical acceptability poses a significant challenge, as traditional pixelagreement metrics often fail to capture true diagnostic utility. This paper introduces Hierarchical Clinical Reasoner (HCR), a novel framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) as clinical guardrails for reliable, zero-shot quality assessment. HCR employs a structured, multistage prompting strategy that guides LLMs through a detailed reasoning process, encompassing knowledge recall, visual feature analysis, anatomical inference, and clinical synthesis, to evaluate segmentations. We evaluated HCR on a diverse dataset across six medical imaging tasks. Our results show that HCR, utilizing models like Gemini 2.5 Flash, achieved a classification accuracy of 78.12%, performing comparably to, and in instances exceeding, dedicated vision models such as ResNet50 (72.92% accuracy) that were specifically trained for this task. The HCR framework not only provides accurate quality classifications but also generates interpretable, step-by-step reasoning for its assessments. This work demonstrates the potential of LLMs, when appropriately guided, to serve as sophisticated evaluators, offering a pathway towards more trustworthy and clinically-aligned quality control for AI in medical imaging.