arXiv:2506.05390cs.CLcs.LG2025-06中稿 · FAccT 2025被引 8

分析AI生成商品描述中的性别偏见,揭示电商场景下新型算法歧视

Understanding Gender Bias in AI-Generated Product Descriptions

  • 构建电商场景下性别偏见的分类体系,结合现有伦理框架
  • 在GPT-3.5和专用电商模型中验证偏见普遍存在
  • 发现服装尺码假设、宣传点刻板化、话术差异等独特问题

尽管大语言模型中的性别偏见在多个领域已被广泛研究,但其在电子商务中的应用仍鲜受关注,可能暴露新型算法偏见与伤害。本文在此领域开展研究,构建了商品描述生成场景下的性别偏见数据驱动分类体系,并将其与现有通用危害分类框架相对照。研究揭示了AI生成商品描述可能以特殊方式呈现性别偏见,需采用专门的检测与缓解方法。通过定量分析两个模型(GPT-3.5与电商专用LLM)在该任务中的表现,证实这些偏见在实践中普遍存在的现象。结果揭示了若干未被充分探讨的性别偏见维度,如对服装尺码的刻板假设、产品特征宣传中的刻板印象,以及使用说服性语言的差异。这些发现有助于理解当前框架中识别出的三类人工智能危害:排斥性规范、刻板印象与性能差异,尤其针对电商应用场景。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

While gender bias in large language models (LLMs) has been extensively studied in many domains, uses of LLMs in e-commerce remain largely unexamined and may reveal novel forms of algorithmic bias and harm. Our work investigates this space, developing data-driven taxonomic categories of gender bias in the context of product description generation, which we situate with respect to existing general purpose harms taxonomies. We illustrate how AI-generated product descriptions can uniquely surface gender biases in ways that require specialized detection and mitigation approaches. Further, we quantitatively analyze issues corresponding to our taxonomic categories in two models used for this task -- GPT-3.5 and an e-commerce-specific LLM -- demonstrating that these forms of bias commonly occur in practice. Our results illuminate unique, under-explored dimensions of gender bias, such as assumptions about clothing size, stereotypical bias in which features of a product are advertised, and differences in the use of persuasive language. These insights contribute to our understanding of three types of AI harms identified by current frameworks: exclusionary norms, stereotyping, and performance disparities, particularly for the context of e-commerce.

性别偏见电商大模型算法公平

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。