用动物行为学方法分析强化学习智能体,发现无模型算法也能自发规划。
Deep RL Needs Deep Behavior Analysis: Exploring Implicit Planning by Model-Free Agents in Open-Ended Environments
- 借鉴神经科学工具分析DRL智能体在复杂环境中的行为与神经动态。
- 模型无关的RNN智能体在无显式记忆时仍表现出结构化规划行为。
- 为复杂智能体提供可复用的行为分析框架,适合研究自主系统。
理解深度强化学习(DRL)智能体的行为——尤其是当任务和智能体复杂度提升时——需要超越简单的奖励曲线对比,但当前的标准行为分析方法仍不成熟。本文在新设计的复杂部分可观测环境ForageWorld中应用神经科学与行为学工具,该环境模拟真实动物觅食的关键特征:稀疏且可耗尽的资源区、捕食者威胁及空间扩展的场地。以该环境为平台,结合行为与神经联合分析,揭示了智能体策略、记忆与规划的定量细节。出乎意料的是,基于RNN的无模型DRL智能体虽未使用显式记忆模块或世界模型,仍能通过涌现动力学展现出结构化、类规划行为。结果表明,将DRL智能体如动物般分析——运用受神经行为学启发的方法揭示行为与神经动态中的结构——可发掘出原本隐藏的学习动态。我们提炼出一套通用分析框架,将核心行为与表征特征与诊断方法关联,适用于多种任务与智能体。随着智能体日益复杂与自主,融合神经科学、认知科学与人工智能至关重要,不仅用于理解行为,更确保安全对齐并最大化难以通过奖励衡量的优良行为。本文展示了如何借鉴生物智能研究的经验实现这一目标。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Understanding the behavior of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents -particularly as task and agent sophistication increase- requires more than simple comparison of reward curves, yet standard methods for behavioral analysis remain underdeveloped in DRL. We apply tools from neuroscience and ethology to study DRL agents in a novel, complex, partially observable environment, ForageWorld, designed to capture key aspects of real-world animal foraging- including sparse, depleting resource patches, predator threats, and spatially extended arenas. We use this environment as a platform for applying joint behavioral and neural analysis to agents, revealing detailed, quantitatively grounded insights into agent strategies, memory, and planning. Contrary to common assumptions, we find that model-free RNN-based DRL agents can exhibit structured, planning-like behavior purely through emergent dynamics- without requiring explicit memory modules or world models. Our results show that studying DRL agents like animals -analyzing them with neuroethology-inspired tools that reveal structure in both behavior and neural dynamics- uncovers rich structure in their learning dynamics that would otherwise remain invisible. We distill these tools into a general analysis framework linking core behavioral and representational features to diagnostic methods, which can be reused for a wide range of tasks and agents. As agents grow more complex and autonomous, bridging neuroscience, cognitive science, and AI will be essential- not just for understanding their behavior, but for ensuring safe alignment and maximizing desirable behaviors that are hard to measure via reward. We show how this can be done by drawing on lessons from how biological intelligence is studied.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。