arXiv:2506.07754cs.LGcs.AI2025-06被引 1

对比发现:生成式AI在信用评分上仍不如传统方法。

Comparing Credit Risk Estimates in the Gen-AI Era

  • 用生成式AI与传统模型对比信用评分效果
  • 无论怎么融合,生成式AI性能均不及传统方法
  • 适合关注金融AI落地局限的研究者

生成式AI技术在多个应用中展现出巨大潜力。本研究对信用评分建模方法进行了对比分析,比较了传统方法与基于生成式AI的方法。结果表明,无论采用何种集成策略,当前生成式AI模型在信用风险评估上的表现均未能达到传统方法的水平。这一发现凸显了生成式AI在信用评分任务中的当前局限性,强调在将其应用于此类特定任务或类似场景前,仍需进一步研究与开发。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Generative AI technologies have demonstrated significant potential across diverse applications. This study provides a comparative analysis of credit score modeling techniques, contrasting traditional approaches with those leveraging generative AI. Our findings reveal that current generative AI models fall short of matching the performance of traditional methods, regardless of the integration strategy employed. These results highlight the limitations in the current capabilities of generative AI for credit risk scoring, emphasizing the need for further research and development before the possibility of applying generative AI for this specific task, or equivalent ones.

信用风险生成式AI金融AI

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。