为复杂环境问答设计可动态调整评估粒度的生成式奖励模型
EQA-RM: A Generative Embodied Reward Model with Test-time Scaling
- 用对比分组相对策略优化训练生成式多模态奖励模型
- 仅用700样本即达61.9%准确率,优于Gemini/GPT-4等主流模型
- 支持推理时动态生成简洁评分或详细逻辑分析,适合部署调试
奖励模型在大模型对齐中至关重要,但在需要空间、时间与逻辑理解的复杂具身任务(如具身问答)中仍研究不足。本文提出EQA-RM,一种专为具身问答设计的生成式多模态奖励模型,通过创新的对比分组相对策略优化(C-GRPO)训练,能学习细微行为差异。其生成特性可提供结构化、可解释的奖励反馈(非单一数值),独特支持推理时动态调整评估粒度——从简洁评分到详尽推理与定位分析,无需重新训练。同时,我们构建了基于OpenEQA的EQA-RewardBench基准,用于标准化评估。实验表明,微调Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct的EQA-RM仅需700样本即在EQA-RM-Bench上达到61.9%准确率,超越包括Gemini-2.5-Flash、GPT-4o、Claude-3.5-Haiku在内的多个强基线及开源模型如RoVRM和VisualPRM。代码与数据集见https://github.com/UNITES-Lab/EQA-RM。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Reward Models (RMs), vital for large model alignment, are underexplored for complex embodied tasks like Embodied Question Answering (EQA) where nuanced evaluation of agents' spatial, temporal, and logical understanding is critical yet not considered by generic approaches. We introduce EQA-RM, a novel generative multimodal reward model specifically architected for EQA, trained via our innovative Contrastive Group Relative Policy Optimization (C-GRPO) strategy to learn fine-grained behavioral distinctions. The generative nature of EQA-RM provides interpretable, structured reward feedback (beyond simple scalars), uniquely enabling test-time scaling to dynamically adjust evaluation granularity, from concise scores to detailed critiques of reasoning and grounding, at inference without retraining. Concurrently, we introduce EQARewardBench, a new benchmark built on OpenEQA for standardized EQA reward model assessment. Demonstrating high sample efficiency, EQA-RM (fine-tuning Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct) achieves 61.9\% accuracy on EQA-RM-Bench with only 700 samples, outperforming strong proprietary baselines, including Gemini-2.5-Flash, GPT-4o, Claude-3.5-Haiku, and open-sourced state-of-the-art models such as RoVRM and VisualPRM. The code and dataset can be found here https://github.com/UNITES-Lab/EQA-RM.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。