arXiv:2506.11831stat.MLcs.LG2025-06中稿 · UAI 2025被引 6

不精确优化也能高效寻优,随机网格搜索够用

Bayesian Optimization with Inexact Acquisition: Is Random Grid Search Sufficient?

  • 用随机网格搜索替代精确求解,降低计算开销
  • 理论证明:累积误差可控时仍能实现次线性后悔率
  • 适合追求效率的黑箱优化场景,如超参调优

贝叶斯优化(BO)是优化黑箱函数的常用迭代算法。每轮需最大化采集函数(如上置信界UCB或高斯过程后验样本路径),但精确求解常不可行且代价高。本文研究采集函数求解不精确的影响,定义了不精确度量,并在无需精确解的前提下,为GP-UCB和GP-TS建立了累积后悔界。结果表明,在累积不精确度受控条件下,不精确的贝叶斯优化仍可实现次线性累积后悔。基于此,本文从理论上和数值上验证了随机网格搜索作为采集函数求解器的有效性与高效性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a widely used iterative algorithm for optimizing black-box functions. Each iteration requires maximizing an acquisition function, such as the upper confidence bound (UCB) or a sample path from the Gaussian process (GP) posterior, as in Thompson sampling (TS). However, finding an exact solution to these maximization problems is often intractable and computationally expensive. Reflecting such realistic situations, in this paper, we delve into the effect of inexact maximizers of the acquisition functions. Defining a measure of inaccuracy in acquisition solutions, we establish cumulative regret bounds for both GP-UCB and GP-TS without requiring exact solutions of acquisition function maximization. Our results show that under appropriate conditions on accumulated inaccuracy, inexact BO algorithms can still achieve sublinear cumulative regret. Motivated by such findings, we provide both theoretical justification and numerical validation for random grid search as an effective and computationally efficient acquisition function solver.

贝叶斯优化随机搜索后悔率分析

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。