arXiv:2506.12020cs.CCcs.AI2025-06ICML被引 2

发现可高效求边缘化的函数未必能用现有电路模型简洁表示。

The Limits of Tractable Marginalization

  • 提出边缘化复杂度层级,揭示现有电路模型的局限性。
  • 在FP≠#P假设下,构造出无法用小电路表示的边缘化易函数。
  • 证明虚拟证据边缘化高效时,必存在小规模多线性电路表示。

边缘化——对函数在输入子集上所有赋值求和——是概率推断与形式验证中的基础计算问题。尽管一般情况下该问题计算困难,但许多函数(如概率模型)仍具有可处理的边缘化,且常可通过计算多线性多项式的多项式大小算术电路表达。这引发一个问题:所有具有多项式时间边缘化算法的函数,是否都能被此类电路简洁表示?本文给出否定答案:在FP≠#P(由P≠NP蕴含)假设下,我们构造出简单函数,其边缘化可高效计算,却无法被已知模型有效表示。为此,我们定义了更强形式边缘化的复杂度层级,这些层级在现有电路模型中均可高效计算。最后,我们得到一个完备性结果:若某函数存在高效的实随机存取机进行虚拟证据边缘化,则其多线性表示必存在小型电路。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Marginalization -- summing a function over all assignments to a subset of its inputs -- is a fundamental computational problem with applications from probabilistic inference to formal verification. Despite its computational hardness in general, there exist many classes of functions (e.g., probabilistic models) for which marginalization remains tractable, and they can be commonly expressed by polynomial size arithmetic circuits computing multilinear polynomials. This raises the question, can all functions with polynomial time marginalization algorithms be succinctly expressed by such circuits? We give a negative answer, exhibiting simple functions with tractable marginalization yet no efficient representation by known models, assuming $\textsf{FP}\neq\#\textsf{P}$ (an assumption implied by $\textsf{P} \neq \textsf{NP}$). To this end, we identify a hierarchy of complexity classes corresponding to stronger forms of marginalization, all of which are efficiently computable on the known circuit models. We conclude with a completeness result, showing that whenever there is an efficient real RAM performing virtual evidence marginalization for a function, then there are small circuits for that function's multilinear representation.

复杂度理论边缘化算术电路

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。