arXiv:2506.14213cs.CL2025-06Conference of the …

用时间跨度推理解决事件时序关系中的误判问题

Chaining Event Spans for Temporal Relation Grounding

  • 通过预测事件时间跨度,分两步推理时序关系
  • 在TORQUE和TB-dense数据集上显著优于现有方法
  • 适合需要精准时序理解的阅读理解与关系抽取任务

准确理解事件间的时序关系是时间阅读理解(TRC)和关系抽取(TRE)等任务的关键。例如,在TRC中,两个字面相似的问题——“什么在决定前刚完成?”与“什么在决定后刚完成?”——需通过时序语义区分。现有方法依赖答案重叠作为标签来对比相似与不相似问题,但答案偶然重合会导致误判。为此,本文提出一种新方法:通过事件时间跨度预测模块,引入时间线推理网络(TRN),采用两步归纳推理——先结合语义与句法信息回答问题,再将同一事件的相关问题串联形成时间线,用于答案定位。在TORQUE(TRC)和TB-dense(TRE)数据集上的实验表明,该方法能有效消除虚假答案重叠,性能优于先前方法。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Accurately understanding temporal relations between events is a critical building block of diverse tasks, such as temporal reading comprehension (TRC) and relation extraction (TRE). For example in TRC, we need to understand the temporal semantic differences between the following two questions that are lexically near-identical: "What finished right before the decision?" or "What finished right after the decision?". To discern the two questions, existing solutions have relied on answer overlaps as a proxy label to contrast similar and dissimilar questions. However, we claim that answer overlap can lead to unreliable results, due to spurious overlaps of two dissimilar questions with coincidentally identical answers. To address the issue, we propose a novel approach that elicits proper reasoning behaviors through a module for predicting time spans of events. We introduce the Timeline Reasoning Network (TRN) operating in a two-step inductive reasoning process: In the first step model initially answers each question with semantic and syntactic information. The next step chains multiple questions on the same event to predict a timeline, which is then used to ground the answers. Results on the TORQUE and TB-dense, TRC and TRE tasks respectively, demonstrate that TRN outperforms previous methods by effectively resolving the spurious overlaps using the predicted timeline.

时序理解阅读理解推理模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。