对比分类与回归方法在设备故障预测中的优劣,指导工业维护决策。
A Survey of Predictive Maintenance Methods: An Analysis of Prognostics via Classification and Regression
- 区分基于回归的剩余寿命估计与基于分类的故障概率预测。
- 指出数据不平衡和高维特征是当前主要挑战。
- 适合工业界与研究者参考,推动智能维护系统发展。
预测性维护(PdM)已成为现代工业实践的关键环节,通过减少意外停机和优化资产生命周期管理,提升运行可靠性并控制成本。机器学习与深度学习使设备故障和剩余使用寿命(RUL)的预测更加精准。尽管已有大量相关研究,但尚无专门针对回归与分类方法在预测中比较的独立综述。本文系统分析了多种PdM方法,重点比较了分类与回归在故障预测中的应用。回归方法通常输出具体的RUL估计值,而分类方法则提供在特定时间区间内发生故障的概率。通过对近期文献的综合分析,本文揭示了关键进展、挑战(如数据不平衡、高维特征空间)以及新兴趋势(如混合方法与人工智能驱动的预测系统)。本综述旨在帮助研究人员和从业者理解不同PdM方法的优势与权衡,并为未来研究指明方向,构建更鲁棒、自适应的维护体系。未来工作可包括对公开数据集、基准平台与开源工具的系统性梳理,以支持PdM研究的进一步发展。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Predictive maintenance (PdM) has become a crucial element of modern industrial practice. PdM plays a significant role in operational dependability and cost management by decreasing unforeseen downtime and optimizing asset life cycle management. Machine learning and deep learning have enabled more precise forecasts of equipment failure and remaining useful life (RUL). Although many studies have been conducted on PdM, there has not yet been a standalone comparative study between regression- and classification-based approaches. In this review, we look across a range of PdM methodologies, while focusing more strongly on the comparative use of classification and regression methods in prognostics. While regression-based methods typically provide estimates of RUL, classification-based methods present a forecast of the probability of failure across defined time intervals. Through a comprehensive analysis of recent literature, we highlight key advancements, challenges-such as data imbalance and high-dimensional feature spaces-and emerging trends, including hybrid approaches and AI-enabled prognostic systems. This review aims to provide researchers and practitioners with an awareness of the strengths and compromises of various PdM methods and to help identify future research and build more robust, directed adaptive maintenance systems. Future work may include a systematic review of practical aspects such as public datasets, benchmarking platforms, and open-source tools to support the advancement of PdM research.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。