arXiv:2506.22397eess.IVcs.AI2025-06中稿 · CVPR被引 2

用流匹配方法平衡去雾图像的清晰度与真实感。

HazeMatching: Dehazing Light Microscopy Images with Guided Conditional Flow Matching

  • 基于条件流匹配,用模糊图像引导生成过程。
  • 在5个数据集上实现保真度与真实感的均衡表现。
  • 无需退化模型,适用于真实显微图像去雾。

荧光显微镜是生命科学研究的重要工具。尽管高端共聚焦显微镜可过滤离焦光,但更廉价、易获取的宽场显微镜无法做到,导致图像模糊。计算去雾旨在结合两者的优点,实现低成本但清晰的成像。然而,感知-失真权衡表明,现有方法或侧重数据保真度(如低MSE、高PSNR),或追求感知真实感(如LPIPS、FID),难以兼顾。本文提出HazeMatching,一种新颖的迭代去雾方法,有效平衡保真度与个体预测的真实性。通过在条件速度场中引入模糊观测来引导生成过程,改进了条件流匹配框架。我们在5个数据集(含合成与真实数据)上评估,对比12种基线,结果在保真度与感知质量间保持一致均衡。校准分析显示,模型预测具有良好的置信度。该方法无需显式退化算子,可直接应用于真实显微图像。所有训练与评估数据及代码将公开于宽松许可证下。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Fluorescence microscopy is a major driver of scientific progress in the life sciences. Although high-end confocal microscopes are capable of filtering out-of-focus light, cheaper and more accessible microscopy modalities, such as widefield microscopy, can not, which consequently leads to hazy image data. Computational dehazing is trying to combine the best of both worlds, leading to cheap microscopy but crisp-looking images. The perception-distortion trade-off tells us that we can optimize either for data fidelity, e.g. low MSE or high PSNR, or for data realism, measured by perceptual metrics such as LPIPS or FID. Existing methods either prioritize fidelity at the expense of realism, or produce perceptually convincing results that lack quantitative accuracy. In this work, we propose HazeMatching, a novel iterative method for dehazing light microscopy images, which effectively balances these objectives. Our goal was to find a balanced trade-off between the fidelity of the dehazing results and the realism of individual predictions (samples). We achieve this by adapting the conditional flow matching framework by guiding the generative process with a hazy observation in the conditional velocity field. We evaluate HazeMatching on 5 datasets, covering both synthetic and real data, assessing both distortion and perceptual quality. Our method is compared against 12 baselines, achieving a consistent balance between fidelity and realism on average. Additionally, with calibration analysis, we show that HazeMatching produces well-calibrated predictions. Note that our method does not need an explicit degradation operator to exist, making it easily applicable on real microscopy data. All data used for training and evaluation and our code will be publicly available under a permissive license.

去雾显微图像流匹配生成模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。