arXiv:2506.22520cs.HCcs.AI2025-06被引 1

AI导师通过激发好奇心提升学生分子模拟学习效果

Exploring Artificial Intelligence Tutor Teammate Adaptability to Harness Discovery Curiosity and Promote Learning in the Context of Interactive Molecular Dynamics

  • 用大语言模型动态调整AI导师行为,模拟真实互动
  • 高表现团队提出更复杂问题,且与AI互动同步性更强
  • 适合教育科技、人机协作学习研究者参考

本研究探讨人工智能导师在视觉分子动力学平台上的交互式分子动力学任务中对学生好奇驱动参与度和学习成效的影响。通过巫师之奥模式,由人类实验者利用大语言模型实时调整AI导师的探索触发与回应行为,考察其对学生产生自主提问频率与复杂度的作用。11名高中生在60分钟内完成四轮递增难度的分子可视化与计算任务。通过实时观察、记录及交叉递归量化分析(CRQA)评估团队表现与沟通结构。结果显示,高效团队任务完成度更高,理解更深,且高级问题数量与AI引发好奇心显著相关。CRQA指标显示学生与AI间存在动态同步,表明结构性适应性互动可有效促进探索性好奇心。初步成果表明,兼具队友与教师角色的AI能提供自适应反馈,维持学习投入与认知好奇心。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This study examines the impact of an Artificial Intelligence tutor teammate (AI) on student curiosity-driven engagement and learning effectiveness during Interactive Molecular Dynamics (IMD) tasks on the Visual Molecular Dynamics platform. It explores the role of the AI's curiosity-triggering and response behaviors in stimulating and sustaining student curiosity, affecting the frequency and complexity of student-initiated questions. The study further assesses how AI interventions shape student engagement, foster discovery curiosity, and enhance team performance within the IMD learning environment. Using a Wizard-of-Oz paradigm, a human experimenter dynamically adjusts the AI tutor teammate's behavior through a large language model. By employing a mixed-methods exploratory design, a total of 11 high school students participated in four IMD tasks that involved molecular visualization and calculations, which increased in complexity over a 60-minute period. Team performance was evaluated through real-time observation and recordings, whereas team communication was measured by question complexity and AI's curiosity-triggering and response behaviors. Cross Recurrence Quantification Analysis (CRQA) metrics reflected structural alignment in coordination and were linked to communication behaviors. High-performing teams exhibited superior task completion, deeper understanding, and increased engagement. Advanced questions were associated with AI curiosity-triggering, indicating heightened engagement and cognitive complexity. CRQA metrics highlighted dynamic synchronization in student-AI interactions, emphasizing structured yet adaptive engagement to promote curiosity. These proof-of-concept findings suggest that the AI's dual role as a teammate and educator indicates its capacity to provide adaptive feedback, sustaining engagement and epistemic curiosity.

AI教育人机协作好奇心驱动分子模拟

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。