arXiv:2507.00102cs.LGcs.AI2025-07被引 2

让机器学习故障检测既精准又可解释,适合工业质检场景。

Towards transparent and data-driven fault detection in manufacturing: A case study on univariate, discrete time series

  • 用机器学习加SHAP解释模型,实现故障分类与透明化
  • 在端子压接数据上达到95.9%的检测准确率
  • 结合专家评估和扰动分析,确保解释可读可信

现代制造业中保障产品一致性至关重要,尤其在安全关键应用中。传统质量控制依赖人工设定阈值和特征,难以适应生产数据的复杂性和变异性,且需大量领域知识。相比之下,数据驱动方法如机器学习虽检测性能高,但多为黑箱模型,在强调可解释性的工业环境中接受度低。本文提出一种兼具数据驱动与透明性的工业故障检测方法:集成监督学习模型进行多类故障分类,利用Shapley Additive Explanations(SHAP)实现事后可解释性,并结合领域特定可视化技术,将模型解释映射为操作员可理解的特征。此外,提出评估方法:通过定量扰动分析评估解释选择性,通过定性专家评估验证可视化效果。该方法应用于端子压接这一安全关键连接工艺,基于单变量离散时间序列数据集,系统实现95.9%的故障检测准确率,定量选择性分析与定性专家评估均证实生成解释的相关性与可解释性。该以人为本的方法旨在提升数据驱动故障检测的信任度与可解释性,助力工业质量控制系统的实际应用设计。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Ensuring consistent product quality in modern manufacturing is crucial, particularly in safety-critical applications. Conventional quality control approaches, reliant on manually defined thresholds and features, lack adaptability to the complexity and variability inherent in production data and necessitate extensive domain expertise. Conversely, data-driven methods, such as machine learning, demonstrate high detection performance but typically function as black-box models, thereby limiting their acceptance in industrial environments where interpretability is paramount. This paper introduces a methodology for industrial fault detection, which is both data-driven and transparent. The approach integrates a supervised machine learning model for multi-class fault classification, Shapley Additive Explanations for post-hoc interpretability, and a do-main-specific visualisation technique that maps model explanations to operator-interpretable features. Furthermore, the study proposes an evaluation methodology that assesses model explanations through quantitative perturbation analysis and evaluates visualisations by qualitative expert assessment. The approach was applied to the crimping process, a safety-critical joining technique, using a dataset of univariate, discrete time series. The system achieves a fault detection accuracy of 95.9 %, and both quantitative selectivity analysis and qualitative expert evaluations confirmed the relevance and inter-pretability of the generated explanations. This human-centric approach is designed to enhance trust and interpretability in data-driven fault detection, thereby contributing to applied system design in industrial quality control.

故障检测可解释AI工业质检时间序列

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。