arXiv:2507.02496cs.LGcs.DS2025-07被引 5

在线置信区间生成中,如何在保证覆盖率的同时最小化区间长度?

Online Conformal Prediction with Efficiency Guarantees

  • 设计了在线框架下的确定性算法,直接优化区间效率
  • 交换序列下可逼近最优固定区间的长度,错误率趋近于零
  • 对任意输入序列,首次揭示了效率与错误数的权衡极限

我们研究了一种新颖的在线共形预测框架,直接优化预测效率。给定目标误覆盖率 $α > 0$ 和时间范围 $T$,每日需输出一个区间 $I_t \subseteq [0, 1]$,随后真实值 $y_t \in [0, 1]$ 被揭示。目标是在至少 $(1 - α)$-比例的天数上满足 $y_t \in I_t$,同时最小化区间平均长度。该问题为构建高效置信区间的在线版本。我们在任意序列和可交换(随机顺序)序列两种设定下进行分析。对于可交换序列,我们证明可构造出覆盖率为 $(1 - α) - o(1)$、长度不超过事后最优固定区间的区间。而对于任意序列,任何实现平均长度 $μ$-近似于事后最优固定区间的算法,其错误数必须比 $αT$ 多一个依赖于 $μ$ 和问题尺度比的乘性因子。我们提出一个匹配的算法,可恢复所有帕累托最优的 $μ$ 与错误数组合。该算法为确定性方法,对自适应对手鲁棒。这一交换与任意序列之间的差距,与经典在线学习不同:我们证明不存在单一算法能同时在两类场景中达到帕累托最优。此外,我们给出一个算法,能实现两种情形下的近优权衡。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

We study the problem of conformal prediction in a novel online framework that directly optimizes efficiency. In our problem, we are given a target miscoverage rate $α> 0$, and a time horizon $T$. On each day $t \le T$ an algorithm must output an interval $I_t \subseteq [0, 1]$, then a point $y_t \in [0, 1]$ is revealed. The goal of the algorithm is to achieve coverage, that is, $y_t \in I_t$ on (close to) a $(1 - α)$-fraction of days, while maintaining efficiency, that is, minimizing the average volume (length) of the intervals played. This problem is an online analogue to the problem of constructing efficient confidence intervals. We study this problem over arbitrary and exchangeable (random order) input sequences. For exchangeable sequences, we show that it is possible to construct intervals that achieve coverage $(1 - α) - o(1)$, while having length upper bounded by the best fixed interval that achieves coverage in hindsight. For arbitrary sequences however, we show that any algorithm that achieves a $μ$-approximation in average length compared to the best fixed interval achieving coverage in hindsight, must make a multiplicative factor more mistakes than $αT$, where the multiplicative factor depends on $μ$ and the aspect ratio of the problem. Our main algorithmic result is a matching algorithm that can recover all Pareto-optimal settings of $μ$ and number of mistakes. Furthermore, our algorithm is deterministic and therefore robust to an adaptive adversary. This gap between the exchangeable and arbitrary settings is in contrast to the classical online learning problem. In fact, we show that no single algorithm can simultaneously be Pareto-optimal for arbitrary sequences and optimal for exchangeable sequences. On the algorithmic side, we give an algorithm that achieves the near-optimal tradeoff between the two cases.

在线学习共形预测置信区间效率优化

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。