构建标准化框架,评估脂质纳米颗粒递送效率预测模型表现
A Machine Learning Benchmarking Framework for Lipid Nanoparticle Transfection Efficiency Prediction
- 用多种分子表示法搭配机器学习模型系统测试
- 基于1100个脂质结构数据,子结构编码模型最准确
- 为新模型提供可比基准,适合药物研发人员参考
离子化脂质的发现仍是高效脂质纳米颗粒(LNP)介导的RNA递送的关键瓶颈。近年来,机器学习(ML)模型可通过脂质结构直接预测转染效率,实现高通量虚拟筛选并加速候选药物发现。然而,随着新模型不断涌现,缺乏严格统一的基准评估体系,可能削弱其可靠性。本文提出一个稳健的机器学习基准框架,用于评估基于离子化脂质结构的转染效率预测模型。该框架系统比较多种分子表征与广泛机器学习架构,涵盖传统模型、前馈神经网络及先进的图神经网络方法。同时支持模型泛化能力评估与预测可靠性分析,超越标准回归指标。基于由Xu等人原始研究中提取的1100个独特离子化脂质结构的定制数据集,结果表明:采用显式子结构编码的模型始终表现最优,应作为未来新模型开发的基准。相比之下,部分现有图神经网络模型(如AGILE、Chemprop、KPGT)表现较差。本框架提供标准化、透明且全面的评估资源,支持新兴模型间的有效对比,并为脂质递送领域预测模型的发展奠定坚实基础。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The discovery of new ionizable lipids for efficient lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-mediated RNA delivery remains a major bottleneck in RNA therapeutics development. Recent advances demonstrate the potential of machine learning (ML) models to predict transfection efficiency directly from lipid structure, enabling high-throughput virtual screening and accelerating lead identification. However, as new models for LNP transfection prediction continue to emerge, the lack of rigorous and standardized benchmarking poses a significant risk and may undermine confidence in their reliability for discovery. Here, we present a robust ML benchmarking framework for evaluating transfection prediction models based on ionizable lipid structures. This framework systematically benchmarks diverse molecular representations paired with a broad range of ML architectures spanning traditional models, feedforward neural networks, and state-of-the-art graph-based methods. In addition, the presented framework supports assessment of model generalization and evaluates prediction reliability beyond standard regression metrics. Using a curated dataset of 1,100 unique ionizable lipid structures derived from the HeLa transfection dataset originally reported by Xu et al., we show that within this framework, models leveraging explicit molecular substructure encoding consistently achieve the highest predictive accuracy and should serve as essential baselines for the development of new, more sophisticated models. In contrast, some current graph-based models, including AGILE, Chemprop, and KPGT, tend to show comparatively lower accuracy. The presented framework provides a standardized, transparent, and comprehensive benchmarking resource that enables meaningful comparison of emerging architectures and establishes strong baselines for future development of predictive models in lipid-based RNA delivery.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。