数字人文学者普遍认可披露生成式AI使用，但实践中仍很少公开。
Disclosing Generative AI Use in Digital Humanities Research
- 调研数字人文学者对生成式AI披露的态度与实践
- 仅少数研究实际披露了生成式AI的使用情况
- 建议通过机构政策而非个人决定建立披露规范
本综述研究调查了数字人文学者对生成式AI使用披露的看法与做法。结果显示，尽管学者们普遍认可披露生成式AI使用的重要性，但实际研究中披露率仍然很低。受访者在哪些活动最需要披露以及最合适的披露方式上存在分歧。大多数受访者认为，应通过机构政策制定AI披露的保障措施，而非由个人自行决定。研究结果将为学者、机构领导者、资助方及其他相关方制定有效披露政策提供实证指导。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This survey study investigates how digital humanists perceive and approach generative AI disclosure in research. The results indicate that while digital humanities scholars acknowledge the importance of disclosing GenAI use, the actual rate of disclosure in research practice remains low. Respondents differ in their views on which activities most require disclosure and on the most appropriate methods for doing so. Most also believe that safeguards for AI disclosure should be established through institutional policies rather than left to individual decisions. The study's findings will offer empirical guidance to scholars, institutional leaders, funders, and other stakeholders responsible for shaping effective disclosure policies.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。