arXiv:2507.04321cs.RO2025-07被引 2

首个包含多种激光雷达的对比数据集,助力低成本与高端设备性能评估

Lidar Variability: A Novel Dataset and Comparative Study of Solid-State and Spinning Lidars

  • 构建多类型激光雷达数据集,涵盖固态、旋转式及圆顶设计的Mid-360
  • 在无IMU条件下验证主流SLAM算法,发现固态与旋转式雷达性能差异显著
  • 提供点云配准方法定量对比,适合自动驾驶与无人机领域研究者参考

激光雷达广泛应用于机器人定位和三维重建等领域。近年来,低成本固态雷达如Livox Avia和具有圆顶结构的Mid-360被广泛用于便携测绘和无人机任务。然而,现有数据集普遍缺乏对Mid-360等圆顶型雷达的系统性覆盖,难以支持跨平台的算法比较。同时,低预算固态雷达与高端旋转式雷达(如Ouster OS系列)在无惯性测量单元(IMU)条件下的性能差异尚未充分研究。为此,本文提出首个综合包含低功耗固态雷达(Livox Avia)、圆顶型雷达(Mid-360)以及高端旋转式雷达(Ouster系列)的数据集。此外,基于该数据集,我们对先进SLAM算法进行了基准测试,并对点到点、点到面及混合配准方法进行了室内与室外数据的定量分析,为异构激光雷达平台上的未来研究提供了基础参考。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Lidar technology has been widely employed across various applications, such as robot localization in GNSS-denied environments and 3D reconstruction. Recent advancements have introduced different lidar types, including cost-effective solid-state lidars such as the Livox Avia and Mid-360. The Mid-360, with its dome-like design, is increasingly used in portable mapping and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) applications due to its low cost, compact size, and reliable performance. However, the lack of datasets that include dome-shaped lidars, such as the Mid-360, alongside other solid-state and spinning lidars significantly hinders the comparative evaluation of novel approaches across platforms. Additionally, performance differences between low-cost solid-state and high-end spinning lidars (e.g., Ouster OS series) remain insufficiently examined, particularly without an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) in odometry. To address this gap, we introduce a novel dataset comprising data from multiple lidar types, including the low-cost Livox Avia and the dome-shaped Mid-360, as well as high-end spinning lidars such as the Ouster series. Notably, to the best of our knowledge, no existing dataset comprehensively includes dome-shaped lidars such as Mid-360 alongside both other solid-state and spinning lidars. In addition to the dataset, we provide a benchmark evaluation of state-of-the-art SLAM algorithms applied to this diverse sensor data. Furthermore, we present a quantitative analysis of point cloud registration techniques, specifically point-to-point, point-to-plane, and hybrid methods, using indoor and outdoor data collected from the included lidar systems. The outcomes of this study establish a foundational reference for future research in SLAM and 3D reconstruction across heterogeneous lidar platforms.

激光雷达数据集SLAM三维重建

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。