arXiv:2507.10903cs.NIcs.CL2025-07中稿 · IEEE 16th Internat…被引 3

用轻量语言模型+数据库提升网络服务链部署效率

LiLM-RDB-SFC: Lightweight Language Model with Relational Database-Guided DRL for Optimized SFC Provisioning

论文配图:LiLM-RDB-SFC: Lightweight Language Model with Relational Database-Guided DRL for Optimized SFC Provisioning
图 1 · 摘自论文原文
  • 用轻量语言模型解析网络状态,指导强化学习做动态资源调度
  • FLAN-T5模型准确率达94.79%,处理时间仅2小时2分钟
  • 比大模型快96%,适合实时性要求高的网络优化场景

在现代软件定义网络和网络功能虚拟化环境中,服务功能链(SFC)的有效管理与虚拟网络功能(VNF)的最优部署是关键挑战。尽管深度强化学习(DRL)广泛用于动态网络决策,但其对结构化数据和固定动作规则的依赖常限制适应性和响应能力,尤其在不可预测的网络条件下。本文提出LiLM-RDB-SFC,结合轻量语言模型(LiLM)与关系型数据库(RDB),通过回答网络状态查询来引导DRL模型实现高效SFC部署。该方法采用两个轻量语言模型:双向自回归变换器(BART)和微调的语言网络T5(FLAN-T5),以理解网络数据并支持多种与SFC需求、数据中心资源及VNF可用性相关的查询类型。实验表明,FLAN-T5在测试损失(0.00161)上优于BART(0.00734),准确率更高(94.79%对比80.2%),处理时间更短(2小时2分钟对比2小时38分钟)。此外,相比大型语言模型SQLCoder,FLAN-T5在准确率相当的情况下,处理时间减少96%(SQLCoder为54小时43分钟,FLAN-T5为2小时2分钟)。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Effective management of Service Function Chains (SFCs) and optimal Virtual Network Function (VNF) placement are critical challenges in modern Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) environments. Although Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is widely adopted for dynamic network decision-making, its inherent dependency on structured data and fixed action rules often limits adaptability and responsiveness, particularly under unpredictable network conditions. This paper introduces LiLM-RDB-SFC, a novel approach combining Lightweight Language Model (LiLM) with Relational Database (RDB) to answer network state queries to guide DRL model for efficient SFC provisioning. Our proposed approach leverages two LiLMs, Bidirectional and Auto-Regressive Transformers (BART) and the Fine-tuned Language Net T5 (FLAN-T5), to interpret network data and support diverse query types related to SFC demands, data center resources, and VNF availability. Results demonstrate that FLAN-T5 outperforms BART with a lower test loss (0.00161 compared to 0.00734), higher accuracy (94.79% compared to 80.2%), and less processing time (2h 2min compared to 2h 38min). Moreover, when compared to the large language model SQLCoder, FLAN-T5 matches the accuracy of SQLCoder while cutting processing time by 96% (SQLCoder: 54 h 43 min; FLAN-T5: 2 h 2 min).

网络优化轻量模型强化学习SFC部署

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。