arXiv:2507.11806cond-mat.mtrl-scics.LG2025-07被引 26

评测20多个机器学习势函数在金属有机框架材料中的表现

MOFSimBench: Evaluating Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials In Metal--Organic Framework Molecular Modeling

  • 构建MOFSimBench基准测试,涵盖结构优化、动力学稳定性等任务
  • 顶尖模型性能超越经典力场和微调的机器学习势函数
  • 训练数据多样性比模型架构更重要,适合材料模拟研究者参考

通用机器学习原子间势(uMLIPs)已成为加速原子级模拟的强大工具,具备接近量子计算精度的同时保持高效率。然而其在真实应用中的可靠性与有效性仍不明确。金属-有机框架(MOFs)等多孔材料在碳捕集、能源存储和催化中具有重要意义,但其复杂化学组成、结构多样性和孔隙特征,以及缺乏训练数据,给uMLIPs带来挑战。本文提出MOFSimBench基准,评估uMLIPs在结构优化、分子动力学稳定性、体相性质(如体模量、热容)及客体-主体相互作用等关键任务上的表现。在包含多种化学与结构类型的材料集上评估超过20种不同架构的模型,结果显示顶级uMLIPs在所有任务中均优于经典力场和微调的机器学习势函数,表明其已具备在多孔材料建模中部署的能力。分析发现,数据质量——特别是训练集的多样性及非平衡构型的包含——对性能的影响远超模型架构。我们开源了模块化可扩展的基准框架(https://github.com/AI4ChemS/mofsim-bench),为多孔材料建模的采纳与uMLIPs的发展提供开放资源。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Universal machine learning interatomic potentials (uMLIPs) have emerged as powerful tools for accelerating atomistic simulations, offering scalable and efficient modeling with accuracy close to quantum calculations. However, their reliability and effectiveness in practical, real-world applications remain an open question. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and related nanoporous materials are highly porous crystals with critical relevance in carbon capture, energy storage, and catalysis applications. Modeling nanoporous materials presents distinct challenges for uMLIPs due to their diverse chemistry, structural complexity, including porosity and coordination bonds, and the absence from existing training datasets. Here, we introduce MOFSimBench, a benchmark to evaluate uMLIPs on key materials modeling tasks for nanoporous materials, including structural optimization, molecular dynamics (MD) stability, the prediction of bulk properties, such as bulk modulus and heat capacity, and guest-host interactions. Evaluating over 20 models from various architectures on a chemically and structurally diverse materials set, we find that top-performing uMLIPs consistently outperform classical force fields and fine-tuned machine learning potentials across all tasks, demonstrating their readiness for deployment in nanoporous materials modeling. Our analysis highlights that data quality, particularly the diversity of training sets and inclusion of out-of-equilibrium conformations, plays a more critical role than model architecture in determining performance across all evaluated uMLIPs. We release our modular and extendable benchmarking framework at https://github.com/AI4ChemS/mofsim-bench, providing an open resource to guide the adoption for nanoporous materials modeling and further development of uMLIPs.

机器学习势多孔材料分子模拟基准测试

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。