arXiv:2507.12590cs.CVcs.LG2025-07综述被引 2

系统对比像素级作物制图方法,找出了最优流程与适用场景。

From Time-series Generation, Model Selection to Transfer Learning: A Comparative Review of Pixel-wise Approaches for Large-scale Crop Mapping

  • 用细粒度时间序列+Transformer模型效果最佳
  • 标签少时用适配域偏移的迁移学习更可靠
  • 适合农业遥感研究者与政策制定者参考

作物制图通过空间数据识别和分类作物类型,主要依赖遥感影像。本研究首次全面综述大规模像素级作物制图流程,涵盖传统监督方法与新兴迁移学习技术。我们系统比较了六种常用卫星影像预处理方法及十一种监督像素分类模型,评估了训练样本量与变量组合的影响,并针对不同域偏移程度识别最优迁移学习策略。评估在五个多样化农业站点进行,使用Landsat 8作为主数据源,标签来自CDL可信像素和实地调查。结果表明:细粒度时间间隔预处理结合Transformer模型在监督与可迁移流程中表现最优;随机森林(RF)在传统监督学习与相似域直接迁移中训练快且性能好;迁移学习显著提升适应性,无监督域自适应(UDA)适用于同质作物类别,微调则在多样场景中均稳健。模型选择高度依赖标签样本数量:样本充足时监督训练更准确泛化;样本不足时,匹配域偏移程度的迁移学习是可行替代方案。所有代码公开,促进可复现性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Crop mapping involves identifying and classifying crop types using spatial data, primarily derived from remote sensing imagery. This study presents the first comprehensive review of large-scale, pixel-wise crop mapping workflows, encompassing both conventional supervised methods and emerging transfer learning approaches. To identify the optimal time-series generation approaches and supervised crop mapping models, we conducted systematic experiments, comparing six widely adopted satellite image-based preprocessing methods, alongside eleven supervised pixel-wise classification models. Additionally, we assessed the synergistic impact of varied training sample sizes and variable combinations. Moreover, we identified optimal transfer learning techniques for different magnitudes of domain shift. The evaluation of optimal methods was conducted across five diverse agricultural sites. Landsat 8 served as the primary satellite data source. Labels come from CDL trusted pixels and field surveys. Our findings reveal three key insights. First, fine-scale interval preprocessing paired with Transformer models consistently delivered optimal performance for both supervised and transferable workflows. RF offered rapid training and competitive performance in conventional supervised learning and direct transfer to similar domains. Second, transfer learning techniques enhanced workflow adaptability, with UDA being effective for homogeneous crop classes while fine-tuning remains robust across diverse scenarios. Finally, workflow choice depends heavily on the availability of labeled samples. With a sufficient sample size, supervised training typically delivers more accurate and generalizable results. Below a certain threshold, transfer learning that matches the level of domain shift is a viable alternative to achieve crop mapping. All code is publicly available to encourage reproducibility practice.

作物制图遥感迁移学习像素分类

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。