用强化学习训练能深度纠错的智能评论模型,提升大模型自我改进能力。
RefCritic: Training Long Chain-of-Thought Critic Models with Refinement Feedback
- 基于双重奖励机制的强化学习,生成有行动指导意义的深度评语。
- 在五项基准测试中,纠错准确率提升6.8%~7.2%,且投票数越多越有效。
- 适合需要高精度推理与自我修正能力的研究者或系统开发者。
随着大语言模型的快速发展,构建有效的批评模块以实现精准引导变得至关重要但极具挑战。本文首次表明,当前广泛采用的监督微调方法无法真正提升模型的批评能力,导致评语流于表面、缺乏反思与验证。为此,我们提出RefCritic——一种基于强化学习的长链式思维批评模块,采用双重规则奖励:(1) 解决方案判断的实例级正确性,(2) 基于批评反馈的策略模型修正准确性,旨在生成高质量、可操作的评估结果,有效指导模型优化。我们在Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct和DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B上对RefCritic进行评估,覆盖五个基准。在批评与修正设置下,其在所有基准上均表现更优,例如在AIME25上分别取得6.8%和7.2%的提升。值得注意的是,在多数投票机制下,经RefCritic筛选的策略模型展现出更强的扩展性。此外,尽管仅使用解级监督,RefCritic在识别数学推理错误步骤的ProcessBench上仍优于步级监督方法。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
With the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs), developing effective critic modules for precise guidance has become crucial yet challenging. In this paper, we initially demonstrate that supervised fine-tuning for building critic modules (which is widely adopted in current solutions) fails to genuinely enhance models' critique abilities, producing superficial critiques with insufficient reflections and verifications. To unlock the unprecedented critique capabilities, we propose RefCritic, a long-chain-of-thought critic module based on reinforcement learning with dual rule-based rewards: (1) instance-level correctness of solution judgments and (2) refinement accuracies of the policy model based on critiques, aiming to generate high-quality evaluations with actionable feedback that effectively guides model refinement. We evaluate RefCritic on Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B across five benchmarks. On critique and refinement settings, RefCritic demonstrates consistent advantages across all benchmarks, e.g., 6.8\% and 7.2\% gains on AIME25 for the respective base models. Notably, under majority voting, policy models filtered by RefCritic show superior scaling with increased voting numbers. Moreover, despite training on solution-level supervision, RefCritic outperforms step-level supervised approaches on ProcessBench, a benchmark to identify erroneous steps in mathematical reasoning.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。