arXiv:2507.15759cs.CL2025-07被引 4

人机协作中,互动本身即是智能的核心。

Interaction as Intelligence: Deep Research With Human-AI Partnership

  • 将人机互动从指令传递升级为认知共治,实现动态干预与协同思考。
  • 在六项指标上超越基线,研究效率提升最高达50%。
  • 适合需要深度探索与持续优化的科研人员使用。

本文提出「互动即智能」的研究范式,重新定义人机在深度研究任务中的关系。传统系统采用“输入-等待-输出”模式,导致错误累积、问题边界僵化且难以动态调整。为此,我们设计Deep Cognition系统,使人类从下达指令转向认知监督:通过透明、可中断的交互机制,在关键节点介入AI推理过程;支持细粒度双向对话;建立共享认知上下文,自动适应用户行为。用户评估显示,该系统在六大核心指标上显著优于基线,提升幅度达18.5%至29.2%;在复杂研究任务中,性能提升达31.8%至50.0%。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This paper introduces "Interaction as Intelligence" research series, presenting a reconceptualization of human-AI relationships in deep research tasks. Traditional approaches treat interaction merely as an interface for accessing AI capabilities-a conduit between human intent and machine output. We propose that interaction itself constitutes a fundamental dimension of intelligence. As AI systems engage in extended thinking processes for research tasks, meaningful interaction transitions from an optional enhancement to an essential component of effective intelligence. Current deep research systems adopt an "input-wait-output" paradigm where users initiate queries and receive results after black-box processing. This approach leads to error cascade effects, inflexible research boundaries that prevent question refinement during investigation, and missed opportunities for expertise integration. To address these limitations, we introduce Deep Cognition, a system that transforms the human role from giving instructions to cognitive oversight-a mode of engagement where humans guide AI thinking processes through strategic intervention at critical junctures. Deep cognition implements three key innovations: (1)Transparent, controllable, and interruptible interaction that reveals AI reasoning and enables intervention at any point; (2)Fine-grained bidirectional dialogue; and (3)Shared cognitive context where the system observes and adapts to user behaviors without explicit instruction. User evaluation demonstrates that this cognitive oversight paradigm outperforms the strongest baseline across six key metrics: Transparency(+20.0%), Fine-Grained Interaction(+29.2%), Real-Time Intervention(+18.5%), Ease of Collaboration(+27.7%), Results-Worth-Effort(+8.8%), and Interruptibility(+20.7%). Evaluations on challenging research problems show 31.8% to 50.0% points of improvements over deep research systems.

人机协作认知共治深度研究

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。