arXiv:2507.17316stat.MLcs.LG2025-07被引 3

提出高概率下离散分布估计的近似最优方法,解决KL散度下的关键难题。

Nearly Minimax Discrete Distribution Estimation in Kullback-Leibler Divergence with High Probability

  • 用在线学习技术构造新估计器,通过在线转批量实现
  • 理论证明最优率在 (K + lnK·ln(1/δ))/n 与 (K ln ln K + lnK·ln(1/δ))/n 之间
  • 发现标准方法不适用,需引入弱假设检验新范式

研究在样本量 n 与误差概率 δ 条件下,对大小为 K 的离散分布进行高概率 KL 散度估计的极小极大率。上界与下界表明,最优率介于 (K + lnK·ln(1/δ))/n 与 (K ln ln K + lnK·ln(1/δ))/n 之间,仅差一个双重对数因子 ln ln K。上界利用在线学习的在线转批量技巧构造新估计器;令人意外的是,其尾部行为比平方总变差和平方 Hellinger 距离更差,后两者率为 (K + ln(1/δ))/n(无 lnK·ln(1/δ) 项)。因此无法通过常规缩减至小距离获得完全紧下界。此外,标准假设检验还原法也无法达到该下界,必须引入新的“弱假设检验”还原方式。进一步分析显示,若排除小于 O(ln(K/δ)/n) 概率的事件,则最大似然估计可实现总变差率,从而解释为何极小极大估计比渐近估计更困难。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

We consider the fundamental problem of estimating a discrete distribution on a domain of size $K$ with high probability in Kullback-Leibler divergence. We provide upper and lower bounds on the minimax estimation rate, which show that the optimal rate is between $\big(K + \ln(K)\ln(1/δ)\big) /n$ and $\big(K\ln\ln(K) + \ln(K)\ln(1/δ)\big) /n$ at error probability $δ$ and sample size $n$, which pins down the rate up to the doubly logarithmic factor $\ln \ln K$ that multiplies $K$. Our upper bound uses techniques from online learning to construct a novel estimator via online-to-batch conversion. Perhaps surprisingly, the tail behavior of the minimax rate is worse than for the squared total variation and squared Hellinger distance, for which it is $\big(K + \ln(1/δ)\big) /n$, i.e. without the $\ln K$ multiplying $\ln (1/δ)$. As a consequence, we cannot obtain a fully tight lower bound from the usual reduction to these smaller distances. Moreover, we show that this lower bound cannot be achieved by the standard lower bound approach based on a reduction to hypothesis testing, and instead we need to introduce a new reduction to what we call weak hypothesis testing. We investigate the source of the gap with other divergences further in refined results, which show that the total variation rate is achievable for Kullback-Leibler divergence after all (in fact by he maximum likelihood estimator) if we rule out outcome probabilities smaller than $O(\ln(K/δ) / n)$, which is a vanishing set as $n$ increases for fixed $K$ and $δ$. This explains why minimax Kullback-Leibler estimation is more difficult than asymptotic estimation.

分布估计信息论统计推断高概率

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。