对比10种深度学习模型,评估其在X光安检中识破违禁品的性能
Illicit object detection in X-ray imaging using deep learning techniques: A comparative evaluation
- 构建统一框架,用6个公开数据集测试主流检测模型
- 发现混合架构在准确率和速度上综合表现最优
- 结果代码与模型公开,助力后续研究可复现
自动化X光检测对公共场所安全筛查至关重要,但物体遮挡、物品物理特性差异、设备多样性及训练数据有限等因素影响检测精度。尽管相关研究众多,实验评估常不完整且结论矛盾。为此,本文开展系统性、全面的对比评估,涵盖六大数据集(OPIXray、CLCXray、SIXray、EDS、HiXray、PIDray),十种前沿目标检测模型(包括通用CNN、定制CNN、通用Transformer及混合架构),并使用mAP50、mAP50:95、推理时间(ms)、参数量(M)、计算量(GFLOPS)等指标进行多维度分析。结果揭示了各类模型的整体表现、物体级检测能力、数据集特异性以及效率与复杂度权衡。为促进可复现性,评估代码与模型权重已开源至https://github.com/jgenc/xray-comparative-evaluation。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Automated X-ray inspection is crucial for efficient and unobtrusive security screening in various public settings. However, challenges such as object occlusion, variations in the physical properties of items, diversity in X-ray scanning devices, and limited training data hinder accurate and reliable detection of illicit items. Despite the large body of research in the field, reported experimental evaluations are often incomplete, with frequently conflicting outcomes. To shed light on the research landscape and facilitate further research, a systematic, detailed, and thorough comparative evaluation of recent Deep Learning (DL)-based methods for X-ray object detection is conducted. For this, a comprehensive evaluation framework is developed, composed of: a) Six recent, large-scale, and widely used public datasets for X-ray illicit item detection (OPIXray, CLCXray, SIXray, EDS, HiXray, and PIDray), b) Ten different state-of-the-art object detection schemes covering all main categories in the literature, including generic Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), custom CNN, generic transformer, and hybrid CNN-transformer architectures, and c) Various detection (mAP50 and mAP50:95) and time/computational-complexity (inference time (ms), parameter size (M), and computational load (GFLOPS)) metrics. A thorough analysis of the results leads to critical observations and insights, emphasizing key aspects such as: a) Overall behavior of the object detection schemes, b) Object-level detection performance, c) Dataset-specific observations, and d) Time efficiency and computational complexity analysis. To support reproducibility of the reported experimental results, the evaluation code and model weights are made publicly available at https://github.com/jgenc/xray-comparative-evaluation.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。