用机器人和真人实验验证便携平衡垫的可靠性和有效性
Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Balance Mat for Measuring Postural Stability: A Combined Robot-Human Approach
- 用机械臂生成标准摇摆数据,测试设备可靠性
- 真人实验显示路径和范围相关性中等至强
- 校准后设备能准确测量不同站姿下的身体晃动
姿势摇摆评估对发现平衡问题和跌倒风险人群至关重要。力板(FP)是实验室条件下姿势摇摆评估的金标准,但其便携性差且需专业操作,限制了广泛应用。本研究评估了一种新型便携式平衡垫(BM)设备的可靠性和有效性,该设备采用光纤技术,成本较低。研究包含两部分:机器人实验和人体实验。在机器人实验中,使用UR10机械臂生成受控摇摆模式,评估BM的可靠性和敏感性。在人体实验中,51名健康年轻人在同时使用BM和FP的情况下完成平衡任务,计算并比较两者间的摇摆指标(均值、绝对均值、均方根、路径长度、范围、速度)。通过组内相关系数(ICC)评估可靠性,>0.9为优秀,0.75~0.9为良好。机器人实验结果显示单腿和双腿站立时ICC值为良好至优秀。人体实验表明路径和范围的相关性为中等到强。贝兰德-阿尔特曼图分析显示BM与FP存在比例偏差,即BM高估了摇摆指标。校准后显著改善了两设备的一致性。结果表明,在适当校准后,该设备在多种站姿条件下均能保持一致的摇摆测量,具备可靠性和有效性。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Postural sway assessment is important for detecting balance problems and identifying people at risk of falls. Force plates (FP) are considered the gold standard postural sway assessment method in laboratory conditions, but their lack of portability and requirement of high-level expertise limit their widespread usage. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of a novel Balance Mat (BM) device, a low-cost portable alternative that uses optical fibre technology. The research includes two studies: a robot study and a human study. In the robot study, a UR10 robotic arm was used to obtain controlled sway patterns to assess the reliability and sensitivity of the BM. In the human study, 51 healthy young participants performed balance tasks on the BM in combination with an FP to evaluate the BM's validity. Sway metrics such as sway mean, sway absolute mean, sway root mean square (RMS), sway path, sway range, and sway velocity were calculated from both BM and FP and compared. Reliability was evaluated using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), where values greater than 0.9 were considered excellent and values between 0.75 and 0.9 were considered good. Results from the robot study demonstrated good to excellent ICC values in both single and double-leg stances. The human study showed moderate to strong correlations for sway path and range. Using Bland-Altman plots for agreement analysis revealed proportional bias between the BM and the FP where the BM overestimated sway metrics compared to the FP. Calibration was used to improve the agreement between the devices. The device demonstrated consistent sway measurement across varied stance conditions, establishing both reliability and validity following appropriate calibration.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。