用脑模型选对源数据,提升跨人运动想象解码准确率
When Brain Foundation Model Meets Cauchy-Schwarz Divergence: A New Framework for Cross-Subject Motor Imagery Decoding
- 用预训练脑模型动态筛选相关源被试,避免无效数据干扰
- 结合特征与决策层对齐,准确率分别达86.17%和78.41%
- 适合需要快速适配新用户的脑机接口场景
运动想象(MI)脑电(EEG)信号解码是控制外部设备的关键非侵入式脑机接口范式,深度学习已显著推动其发展。然而,跨被试解码仍因个体间差异大、标注数据少而困难,需耗费大量校准时间。现有多种源域自适应(MSDA)方法常盲目融合所有源域,忽略被试间脑电信号差异,导致负迁移和高计算开销。此外,多数方法仅关注特征分布对齐,忽视特征与分类输出间的显式依赖关系,难以保留判别性结构。为此,我们提出一种新型MSDA框架:利用预训练的大规模脑基础模型(BFM)实现动态且智能的源被试选择,确保仅相关源参与适应。同时,采用柯西-施瓦茨(CS)与条件柯西-施瓦茨(CCS)散度,联合实现特征级与决策级对齐,增强域不变性并保持类别可分性。在两个基准MI-EEG数据集上的广泛实验表明,本框架平均准确率分别达到86.17%和78.41%,显著优于多种先进基线。额外在大规模源池上的实验验证了该方法的可扩展性与高效性。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Decoding motor imagery (MI) electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, a key non-invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) paradigm for controlling external systems, has been significantly advanced by deep learning. However, cross-subject MI-EEG decoding remains challenging due to substantial inter-subject variability and limited labeled target data, which necessitate costly calibration for new users. Many existing multi-source domain adaptation (MSDA) methods indiscriminately incorporate all available source domains, disregarding the large inter-subject differences in EEG signals, which leads to negative transfer and excessive computational costs. Moreover, while many approaches focus on feature distribution alignment, they often neglect the explicit dependence between features and decision-level outputs, limiting their ability to preserve discriminative structures. To address these gaps, we propose a novel MSDA framework that leverages a pretrained large Brain Foundation Model (BFM) for dynamic and informed source subject selection, ensuring only relevant sources contribute to adaptation. Furthermore, we employ Cauchy-Schwarz (CS) and Conditional CS (CCS) divergences to jointly perform feature-level and decision-level alignment, enhancing domain invariance while maintaining class discriminability. Extensive evaluations on two benchmark MI-EEG datasets demonstrate that our framework achieves average accuracies of 86.17% and 78.41%, outperforming a broad range of state-of-the-art baselines. Additional experiments with a large source pool validate the scalability and efficiency of BFM-guided selection.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。