重新定义符号接地问题：机器如何具备有意义的行为能力
Which symbol grounding problem should we try to solve?
- 从计算本质出发，主张符号接地应关注行为功能而非语义承诺
- 批判零语义承诺条件不可实现，指出其自洽性缺陷
- 适合对人工智能哲学与认知科学交叉感兴趣的读者
Floridi 和 Taddeo 提出‘零语义承诺’作为解决符号接地问题的条件，并给出了相应方案。本文认为该条件无法实现，甚至其自身方案也无法满足。在审视 Luc Steels 的不同建议后，提出需重新思考问题本质及系统目标的作用。基于对计算的正确认知，得出唯一合理的接地问题是如何解释并复现人工计算代理中意义的行为能力与功能。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Floridi and Taddeo propose a condition of "zero semantic commitment" for solutions to the grounding problem, and a solution to it. I argue briefly that their condition cannot be fulfilled, not even by their own solution. After a look at Luc Steels' very different competing suggestion, I suggest that we need to re-think what the problem is and what role the 'goals' in a system play in formulating the problem. On the basis of a proper understanding of computing, I come to the conclusion that the only sensible grounding problem is how we can explain and re-produce the behavioral ability and function of meaning in artificial computational agents
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。