首份法律合同分类综述,系统梳理任务、数据与方法
A Survey of Classification Tasks and Approaches for Legal Contracts
- 归纳7类法律合同分类任务,构建三类方法体系
- 涵盖14个英文合同数据集,覆盖公开、私有及非公开来源
- 适合法律NLP研究者,助力提升合同处理效率与公平性
由于合同规模庞大、内容复杂,人工审查效率低且易出错,亟需自动化解决方案。自动法律合同分类(LCC)显著提升分析速度、准确率与可及性。本综述深入探讨自动LCC的挑战,系统梳理关键任务、数据集与方法。识别出7类分类任务,回顾14个英语合同数据集(包括公开、专有及非公开来源)。提出LCC方法分类体系,分为传统机器学习、深度学习与基于Transformer的方法。同时讨论评估技术,并总结各研究中的最优表现结果。通过全面分析现有方法及其局限,本文指明未来研究方向,以提升LCC的效率、准确率与可扩展性。作为首份关于LCC的综合性综述,旨在支持法律NLP研究者与从业者优化法律流程,推动法律信息普及,促进更明智、更公平的社会发展。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Given the large size and volumes of contracts and their underlying inherent complexity, manual reviews become inefficient and prone to errors, creating a clear need for automation. Automatic Legal Contract Classification (LCC) revolutionizes the way legal contracts are analyzed, offering substantial improvements in speed, accuracy, and accessibility. This survey delves into the challenges of automatic LCC and a detailed examination of key tasks, datasets, and methodologies. We identify seven classification tasks within LCC, and review fourteen datasets related to English-language contracts, including public, proprietary, and non-public sources. We also introduce a methodology taxonomy for LCC, categorized into Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Transformer-based approaches. Additionally, the survey discusses evaluation techniques and highlights the best-performing results from the reviewed studies. By providing a thorough overview of current methods and their limitations, this survey suggests future research directions to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and scalability of LCC. As the first comprehensive survey on LCC, it aims to support legal NLP researchers and practitioners in improving legal processes, making legal information more accessible, and promoting a more informed and equitable society.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。