量子模型比经典模型更抗数据污染,且更容易遗忘错误信息。
Superior resilience to poisoning and amenability to unlearning in quantum machine learning
- 对比经典与量子神经网络对噪声数据的响应差异。
- 量子模型在标签噪声增加时出现性能质变的临界点。
- 量子模型更适合高效删去错误记忆,适合高可靠性场景。
人工智能的可靠性依赖于训练数据的完整性,而数据常因噪声和污染受损。本文通过在经典与量子数据上对比经典与量子神经网络的表现,揭示二者对数据污染的响应存在根本差异。经典模型表现出脆弱的记忆固化,导致泛化能力失效;而量子模型则展现出显著的鲁棒性,其性能随标签噪声增加呈现类似相变的响应,存在一个临界点,超过后模型性能发生质变。我们进一步建立并研究了量子机器遗忘(quantum machine unlearning)领域,即高效迫使训练模型遗忘污染影响的过程。结果表明,经典模型因记忆顽固难以高效遗忘,而量子模型则更易通过近似遗忘方法实现快速遗忘。研究证实,量子机器学习兼具内在鲁棒性与高效适应性,为未来可信、稳健的人工智能提供有前景的范式。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The reliability of artificial intelligence hinges on the integrity of its training data, a foundation often compromised by noise and corruption. Here, through a comparative study of classical and quantum neural networks on both classical and quantum data, we reveal a fundamental difference in their response to data corruption. We find that classical models exhibit brittle memorization, leading to a failure in generalization. In contrast, quantum models demonstrate remarkable resilience, which is underscored by a phase transition-like response to increasing label noise, revealing a critical point beyond which the model's performance changes qualitatively. We further establish and investigate the field of quantum machine unlearning, the process of efficiently forcing a trained model to forget corrupting influences. We show that the brittle nature of the classical model forms rigid, stubborn memories of erroneous data, making efficient unlearning challenging, while the quantum model is significantly more amenable to efficient forgetting with approximate unlearning methods. Our findings establish that quantum machine learning can possess a dual advantage of intrinsic resilience and efficient adaptability, providing a promising paradigm for the trustworthy and robust artificial intelligence of the future.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。