对比两大深度学习框架在易用性、性能和部署上的优劣，助你选对工具。
A Comparative Survey of PyTorch vs TensorFlow for Deep Learning: Usability, Performance, and Deployment Trade-offs
- PyTorch 采用动态编程风格，开发体验更直观；TensorFlow 历来以图执行为主，现支持灵活的即时模式。
- 训练速度相近，但 TensorFlow 在移动端（TensorFlow Lite）和服务器部署（Serving）上生态更成熟。
- 研究者偏爱 PyTorch，企业用户更倾向 TensorFlow，选型需权衡研发与生产需求。
本文全面比较了两大主流深度学习框架 TensorFlow 与 PyTorch，聚焦其易用性、性能与部署权衡。对比分析了两者的编程范式与开发者体验：前者为图执行（现支持可选即时模式），后者为动态、类 Python 风格。基于近期基准测试，评估了多任务与数据场景下的训练速度与推理性能。部署灵活性方面，深入考察了 TensorFlow 成熟的生态系统（如 TensorFlow Lite 移动/嵌入式支持、TensorFlow Serving 及 JavaScript 支持），以及 PyTorch 新兴的生产工具（TorchScript 编译、ONNX 导出、TorchServe）。同时调研了生态与社区支持，包括库集成、产业采纳及研究趋势（如近年论文中 PyTorch 占主导，而 TensorFlow 在企业工具链更广泛）。通过计算机视觉、自然语言处理等领域的实际应用案例说明使用差异。最后提出未来方向：统一即时与图执行、提升跨框架互操作性、整合编译优化（XLA、JIT）以提速。结论表明，两者均具备前沿深度学习能力，但存在显著权衡：PyTorch 适合研究场景的简洁灵活，而 TensorFlow 提供更完整的生产就绪生态。文中包含图表、代码片段及超过 20 篇学术论文与官方文档参考。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This paper presents a comprehensive comparative survey of TensorFlow and PyTorch, the two leading deep learning frameworks, focusing on their usability, performance, and deployment trade-offs. We review each framework's programming paradigm and developer experience, contrasting TensorFlow's graph-based (now optionally eager) approach with PyTorch's dynamic, Pythonic style. We then compare model training speeds and inference performance across multiple tasks and data regimes, drawing on recent benchmarks and studies. Deployment flexibility is examined in depth - from TensorFlow's mature ecosystem (TensorFlow Lite for mobile/embedded, TensorFlow Serving, and JavaScript support) to PyTorch's newer production tools (TorchScript compilation, ONNX export, and TorchServe). We also survey ecosystem and community support, including library integrations, industry adoption, and research trends (e.g., PyTorch's dominance in recent research publications versus TensorFlow's broader tooling in enterprise). Applications in computer vision, natural language processing, and other domains are discussed to illustrate how each framework is used in practice. Finally, we outline future directions and open challenges in deep learning framework design, such as unifying eager and graph execution, improving cross-framework interoperability, and integrating compiler optimizations (XLA, JIT) for improved speed. Our findings indicate that while both frameworks are highly capable for state-of-the-art deep learning, they exhibit distinct trade-offs: PyTorch offers simplicity and flexibility favored in research, whereas TensorFlow provides a fuller production-ready ecosystem - understanding these trade-offs is key for practitioners selecting the appropriate tool. We include charts, code snippets, and more than 20 references to academic papers and official documentation to support this comparative analysis
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。