AI领域'智能体'概念模糊,亟需重新定义以提升研究清晰度
The Term 'Agent' Has Been Diluted Beyond Utility and Requires Redefinition
- 提出多维度评估框架,明确智能体的最低标准
- 强调环境交互、自主性与目标复杂度等核心特性
- 适合研究人员和政策制定者参考,提升沟通一致性
人工智能领域中'智能体'一词长期存在多重解释。随着大语言模型系统的发展,这一术语的模糊性加剧,导致研究交流、系统评估与可复现性、政策制定等方面面临挑战。本文主张对'智能体'进行重新定义。基于历史分析与当代使用模式,提出一个框架,明确系统被视为智能体所需的最低要求,并从环境交互、学习与适应、自主性、目标复杂度及时间连贯性等多个维度刻画系统特征。该框架在保留术语历史多样性的同时,提供精准描述词汇。经讨论反例与实施难点后,提出具体建议,包括术语标准化与框架采纳。该方法有助于提升研究清晰度与可复现性,支持更有效的政策制定。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The term 'agent' in artificial intelligence has long carried multiple interpretations across different subfields. Recent developments in AI capabilities, particularly in large language model systems, have amplified this ambiguity, creating significant challenges in research communication, system evaluation and reproducibility, and policy development. This paper argues that the term 'agent' requires redefinition. Drawing from historical analysis and contemporary usage patterns, we propose a framework that defines clear minimum requirements for a system to be considered an agent while characterizing systems along a multidimensional spectrum of environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal complexity, and temporal coherence. This approach provides precise vocabulary for system description while preserving the term's historically multifaceted nature. After examining potential counterarguments and implementation challenges, we provide specific recommendations for moving forward as a field, including suggestions for terminology standardization and framework adoption. The proposed approach offers practical tools for improving research clarity and reproducibility while supporting more effective policy development.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。