arXiv:2508.07575cs.AI2025-08被引 40

评测大模型调用4000+真实工具的能力,解决评估难问题。

MCPToolBench++: A Large Scale AI Agent Model Context Protocol MCP Tool Use Benchmark

  • 构建涵盖4000+真实MCP工具的多领域评测集
  • 首次在真实环境中量化评估大模型调用工具的成功率
  • 适合研究智能体与工具集成的开发者和研究人员

大型语言模型通过调用函数来整合数据源或API结果以增强能力,典型工具包括搜索、网络爬虫、地图、金融数据、文件系统和浏览器等。这些功能的集成需要标准化方法。模型上下文协议(MCP)提供了一种向大模型提供上下文的标准方式。然而,现有对大模型和智能体使用MCP工具的评估存在诸多问题:缺乏全面的评测数据集;不同工具返回格式多样,增加评估难度;真实场景中工具调用成功率不保证且因服务器而异;同时,大模型的上下文窗口限制了单次可调用工具数量。为应对上述挑战,我们提出MCPToolBench++,一个大规模、多领域的智能体工具使用评测基准。截至2025年7月,该基准基于超过40个类别、4000多个MCP服务器构建,数据来自MCP市场和GitHub社区,包含单步与多步工具调用任务。我们对具备代理能力的主流大模型进行了评测并报告结果。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

LLMs' capabilities are enhanced by using function calls to integrate various data sources or API results into the context window. Typical tools include search, web crawlers, maps, financial data, file systems, and browser usage, etc. Integrating these data sources or functions requires a standardized method. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) provides a standardized way to supply context to LLMs. However, the evaluation of LLMs and AI Agents' MCP tool use abilities suffer from several issues. First, there's a lack of comprehensive datasets or benchmarks to evaluate various MCP tools. Second, the diverse formats of response from MCP tool call execution further increase the difficulty of evaluation. Additionally, unlike existing tool-use benchmarks with high success rates in functions like programming and math functions, the success rate of real-world MCP tool is not guaranteed and varies across different MCP servers. Furthermore, the LLMs' context window also limits the number of available tools that can be called in a single run, because the textual descriptions of tool and the parameters have long token length for an LLM to process all at once. To help address the challenges of evaluating LLMs' performance on calling MCP tools, we propose MCPToolBench++, a large-scale, multi-domain AI Agent tool use benchmark. As of July 2025, this benchmark is build upon marketplace of over 4k MCP servers from more than 40 categories, collected from the MCP marketplaces and GitHub communities. The datasets consist of both single-step and multi-step tool calls across different categories. We evaluated SOTA LLMs with agentic abilities on this benchmark and reported the results.

智能体工具调用评测基准大模型

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。