arXiv:2508.12170cs.RO2025-08综述被引 1

系统梳理2020-2024年机器人软件节能研究,揭示关键瓶颈与优化方向。

Energy Efficiency in Robotics Software: A Systematic Literature Review (2020-2024)

  • 采用自动化结合人工审计的文献筛选流程,确保结果可靠性。
  • 电机/执行器耗能占68.4%,运动优化是主流技术,但通信节能研究不足。
  • 建议统一报告标准,推动跨研究可比性,适合关注能效设计的研究者。

本研究对2020至2024年间发表的机器人软件级节能方法进行系统综述,更新并扩展了2020年前的证据。通过结合谷歌学术种子、前后滚动检索及大语言模型辅助筛选与数据提取,并在每个自动化步骤中进行约10%的人工审核,最终纳入79篇同行评审论文。分析涵盖应用领域、度量指标、评估类型、能量模型、主要能耗源、软件技术类别及能效-性能权衡。工业场景占比最高(31.6%),其次为探索类(25.3%)。68.4%的研究指出电机/执行器为主要能耗源,计算/控制模块次之(13.9%)。仿真评估仍最普遍(51.9%),混合评估亦常见(25.3%)。基于物理的表示型能量模型占主导(87.3%)。运动与轨迹优化为最常用技术(69.6%),常与学习/预测(40.5%)和计算分配/调度(26.6%)结合;而电源管理/空闲控制(11.4%)和通信/数据效率(3.8%)则相对薄弱。报告方式多样:含能量的综合目标最常见,但任务归一化与能效性能比指标较少,影响横向比较。研究提出最小报告清单(如总能耗、平均功率、任务归一化指标及清晰基线),并强调跨层设计与非性能代价(如精度、稳定性)量化的重要性。附带可复现代码包、提示词与冻结数据集。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

This study presents a systematic literature review of software-level approaches to energy efficiency in robotics published from 2020 through 2024, updating and extending pre-2020 evidence. An automated-but-audited pipeline combined Google Scholar seeding, backward/forward snowballing, and large-language-model (LLM) assistance for screening and data extraction, with ~10% human audits at each automated step and consensus-with-tie-breaks for full-text decisions. The final corpus comprises 79 peer-reviewed studies analyzed across application domain, metrics, evaluation type, energy models, major energy consumers, software technique families, and energy-quality trade-offs. Industrial settings dominate (31.6%) followed by exploration (25.3%). Motors/actuators are identified as the primary consumer in 68.4% of studies, with computing/controllers a distant second (13.9%). Simulation-only evaluations remain most common (51.9%), though hybrid evaluations are frequent (25.3%). Representational (physics-grounded) energy models predominate (87.3%). Motion and trajectory optimization is the leading technique family (69.6%), often paired with learning/prediction (40.5%) and computation allocation/scheduling (26.6%); power management/idle control (11.4%) and communication/data efficiency (3.8%) are comparatively underexplored. Reporting is heterogeneous: composite objectives that include energy are most common, while task-normalized and performance-per-energy metrics appear less often, limiting cross-paper comparability. The review offers a minimal reporting checklist (e.g., total energy and average power plus a task-normalized metric and clear baselines) and highlights opportunities in cross-layer designs and in quantifying non-performance trade-offs (accuracy, stability). A replication package with code, prompts, and frozen datasets accompanies the review.

机器人能效系统综述节能优化软件设计

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。