arXiv:2508.12422cs.CV2025-08被引 6

对比人与AI的视觉错觉,揭示两者感知差异与安全隐患

Illusions in Humans and AI: How Visual Perception Aligns and Diverges

  • 通过错觉测试对比人类与AI的视觉机制
  • 发现AI存在像素级敏感和幻觉等独特错觉
  • 为构建更可信的人工智能视觉系统提供方向

通过视觉错觉对比生物与人工感知,揭示二者构建视觉现实的关键差异。理解这些差异有助于发展更稳健、可解释且与人类对齐的AI视觉系统。人类感知依赖上下文假设而非原始感官数据,而随着人工智能承担越来越多类人任务,需追问:AI是否也会经历错觉?是否存在独特的AI错觉?本文研究了涉及颜色、大小、形状和运动的经典视觉错觉在AI中的表现。结果显示,部分错觉效应可通过特定训练或模式识别的副产物产生;但同时也发现像素级敏感性和幻觉等人类不存在的独特错觉。系统性比较揭示了感知对齐的差距及AI特有的感知漏洞,这些漏洞在人类感知中不可见。研究成果为未来兼顾人类有益偏见、避免破坏信任与安全的视觉系统设计提供了洞见。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

By comparing biological and artificial perception through the lens of illusions, we highlight critical differences in how each system constructs visual reality. Understanding these divergences can inform the development of more robust, interpretable, and human-aligned artificial intelligence (AI) vision systems. In particular, visual illusions expose how human perception is based on contextual assumptions rather than raw sensory data. As artificial vision systems increasingly perform human-like tasks, it is important to ask: does AI experience illusions, too? Does it have unique illusions? This article explores how AI responds to classic visual illusions that involve color, size, shape, and motion. We find that some illusion-like effects can emerge in these models, either through targeted training or as by-products of pattern recognition. In contrast, we also identify illusions unique to AI, such as pixel-level sensitivity and hallucinations, that lack human counterparts. By systematically comparing human and AI responses to visual illusions, we uncover alignment gaps and AI-specific perceptual vulnerabilities invisible to human perception. These findings provide insights for future research on vision systems that preserve human-beneficial perceptual biases while avoiding distortions that undermine trust and safety.

视觉感知人工智能错觉研究人机对齐

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。