arXiv:2508.13440cs.CYcs.AI2025-08中稿 · and appearing in J…被引 3

算法时代消费自由是真实还是幻觉?研究揭示三类制约因素如何导致财务崩溃。

Consumer Autonomy or Illusion? Rethinking Consumer Agency in the Age of Algorithms

  • 构建带约束的贴现消费模型,分析结构、行为与时间维度对消费自主的影响。
  • 即使理性决策者,三类制约下仍可能提前陷入财务困境,长期福祉受损。
  • 提出系统干预与教育方案,可量化增强消费者自主性,适合政策制定者参考。

数字时代消费者的自主性正受到系统性障碍和算法操控的侵蚀,消费选择的真实性面临挑战。当前,财务决策受制于强制性消费、算法诱导及工作时间不稳等外部压力,削弱了金融自主权。强制性消费(如隐性费用)在数字生态中加剧;个性化推荐等算法策略引发冲动购买;不稳定的工时也破坏财务规划。为此,本文基于带有约束的贴现消费形式模型,构建三种情景:面临强制支出、算法影响下的冲动消费、或因时间不稳定性导致的收入不可预测。分析表明,即便理性且追求效用最大化的个体,在结构性、行为性或时间性自主受限时,仍可能发生早期财务崩溃,并损害长期财务健康。核心论点是:消费自主应被视为需主动培育的价值,而非理所当然。通过形式化建模,我们建立自主受限(结构、行为或时间)与可度量风险(如财务不稳定)之间的严谨关联,为以消费为价值的规范性主张提供形式基础。作为解决方案,本文研究系统性干预与消费者教育,证明其能有效强化自主性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Consumer agency in the digital age is increasingly constrained by systemic barriers and algorithmic manipulation, raising concerns about the authenticity of consumption choices. Nowadays, financial decisions are shaped by external pressures like obligatory consumption, algorithmic persuasion, and unstable work schedules that erode financial autonomy. Obligatory consumption (like hidden fees) is intensified by digital ecosystems. Algorithmic tactics like personalized recommendations lead to impulsive purchases. Unstable work schedules also undermine financial planning. Thus, it is important to study how these factors impact consumption agency. To do so, we examine formal models grounded in discounted consumption with constraints that bound agency. We construct analytical scenarios in which consumers face obligatory payments, algorithm-influenced impulsive expenses, or unpredictable income due to temporal instability. Using this framework, we demonstrate that even rational, utility-maximizing agents can experience early financial ruin when agency is limited across structural, behavioral, or temporal dimensions and how diminished autonomy impacts long-term financial well-being. Our central argument is that consumer agency must be treated as a value (not a given) requiring active cultivation, especially in digital ecosystems. The connection between our formal modeling and this argument allows us to indicate that limitations on agency (whether structural, behavioral, or temporal) can be rigorously linked to measurable risks like financial instability. This connection is also a basis for normative claims about consumption as a value, by anchoring them in a formally grounded analysis of consumer behavior. As solutions, we study systemic interventions and consumer education to support value deliberation and informed choices. We formally demonstrate how these measures strengthen agency.

消费自主算法影响财务风险行为经济

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。