arXiv:2508.14229physics.med-phcs.AI2025-08被引 1

用可解释AI揭示癌症放疗自动规划的决策逻辑

New Insights into Automatic Treatment Planning for Cancer Radiotherapy Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence

  • 通过可解释AI分析放疗参数调整的输入响应机制
  • 高绩效模型能精准识别剂量违规区域,减少调参步数至13步内
  • 结果有助于提升医生信任,指导智能规划新策略

目的:揭示人工智能在前列腺癌调强放疗自动治疗规划中决策过程的黑箱问题。方法:研究基于经验回放的演员-评论家(ACER)网络训练的AI代理,该代理自动调整治疗计划参数(TPPs)以实现逆向规划。选取训练过程中多个检查点的ACER代理,采用可解释人工智能(EXAI)方法分析剂量体积直方图(DVH)输入对TPP调整决策的贡献度。评估各代理的规划效率与效果,分析其策略及最终参数调整空间。综合分析表明,不同阶段的代理能依据DVH输入逐步学习识别剂量违规区域,并采取相应参数调整以缓解违规。器官层面的剂量违规与归因相似度在0.25至0.5之间。归因与违规缓解匹配度高的代理需更少调参步数(约12–13步,低于22步),参数调整空间更集中(熵值约0.3,低于0.6),仅调整少数关键参数,且实际与理论调参步数差异小。整体表明,高性能的ACER代理能从DVH输入有效识别剂量违规,并采用全局调参策略生成高质量计划,类比于资深临床医师。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Objective: This study aims to uncover the opaque decision-making process of an artificial intelligence (AI) agent for automatic treatment planning. Approach: We examined a previously developed AI agent based on the Actor-Critic with Experience Replay (ACER) network, which automatically tunes treatment planning parameters (TPPs) for inverse planning in prostate cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy. We selected multiple checkpoint ACER agents from different stages of training and applied an explainable AI (EXAI) method to analyze the attribution from dose-volume histogram (DVH) inputs to TPP-tuning decisions. We then assessed each agent's planning efficacy and efficiency and evaluated their policy and final TPP tuning spaces. Combining these analyses, we systematically examined how ACER agents generated high-quality treatment plans in response to different DVH inputs. Results: Attribution analysis revealed that ACER agents progressively learned to identify dose-violation regions from DVH inputs and promote appropriate TPP-tuning actions to mitigate them. Organ-wise similarities between DVH attributions and dose-violation reductions ranged from 0.25 to 0.5 across tested agents. Agents with stronger attribution-violation similarity required fewer tuning steps (~12-13 vs. 22), exhibited a more concentrated TPP-tuning space with lower entropy (~0.3 vs. 0.6), converged on adjusting only a few TPPs, and showed smaller discrepancies between practical and theoretical tuning steps. Putting together, these findings indicate that high-performing ACER agents can effectively identify dose violations from DVH inputs and employ a global tuning strategy to achieve high-quality treatment planning, much like skilled human planners. Significance: Better interpretability of the agent's decision-making process may enhance clinician trust and inspire new strategies for automatic treatment planning.

放疗规划可解释AI强化学习医学影像

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。